Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug 15;11(8):8383-98.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph110808383.

Practical barriers and ethical challenges in genetic data sharing

Claire L Simpson  1 , Aaron J Goldenberg  2 , Rob Culverhouse  3 , Denise Daley  4 , Robert P Igo  5 , Gail P Jarvik  6 , Diptasri M Mandal  7 , Deborah Mascalzoni  8 , Courtney Gray Montgomery  9 , Brandon Pierce  10 , Rosemarie Plaetke  11 , Sanjay Shete  12 , Katrina A B Goddard  13 , Catherine M Stein  14
Affiliations

Practical barriers and ethical challenges in genetic data sharing

Claire L Simpson et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The underlying ethos of dbGaP is that access to these data by secondary data analysts facilitates advancement of science. NIH has required that genome-wide association study data be deposited in the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP) since 2003. In 2013, a proposed updated policy extended this requirement to next-generation sequencing data. However, recent literature and anecdotal reports suggest lingering logistical and ethical concerns about subject identifiability, informed consent, publication embargo enforcement, and difficulty in accessing dbGaP data. We surveyed the International Genetic Epidemiology Society (IGES) membership about their experiences. One hundred and seventy five (175) individuals completed the survey, a response rate of 27%. Of respondents who received data from dbGaP (43%), only 32% perceived the application process as easy but most (75%) received data within five months. Remaining challenges include difficulty in identifying an institutional signing official and an overlong application process. Only 24% of respondents had contributed data to dbGaP. Of these, 31% reported local IRB restrictions on data release; an additional 15% had to reconsent study participants before depositing data. The majority of respondents (56%) disagreed that the publication embargo period was sufficient. In response, we recommend longer embargo periods and use of varied data-sharing models rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. NOT-OD-07-088. [(accessed on 1 August 2014)]. Available online: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-07-088.html.
    1. Kaye J., Heeney C., Hawkins N., de Vries J., Boddington P. Data sharing in genomics—Re-shaping scientific practice. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009;10:331–335. doi: 10.1038/nrg2573. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guttmacher A.E., Nabel E.G., Collins F.S. Why data-sharing policies matter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910317106. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Homer N., Szelinger S., Redman M., Duggan D., Tembe W., Muehling J., Pearson J.V., Stephan D.A., Nelson S.F., Craig D.W. Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays. PLoS Genet. 2008;4 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000167. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jacobs K.B., Yeager M., Wacholder S., Craig D., Kraft P., Hunter D.J., Paschal J., Manolio T.A., Tucker M., Hoover R.N., et al. A new statistic and its power to infer membership in a genome-wide association study using genotype frequencies. Nat. Genet. 2009;41:1253–1257. doi: 10.1038/ng.455. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources