Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 5;16(17):4658-61.
doi: 10.1021/ol5022417. Epub 2014 Aug 25.

Catalytic enantioselective protoboration of disubstituted allenes. Access to alkenylboron compounds in high enantiomeric purity

Affiliations

Catalytic enantioselective protoboration of disubstituted allenes. Access to alkenylboron compounds in high enantiomeric purity

Hwanjong Jang et al. Org Lett. .

Abstract

Proto-boryl additions to 1,1-disubstituted allenes in the presence of 1.0-5.0 mol % of chiral NHC-Cu complexes, B2(pin)2, and t-BuOH proceed to afford alkenyl-B(pin) products in up to 98% yield, >98:2 site selectivity, and 98:2 er. The enantiomerically enriched alkenylboron products can be converted to otherwise difficult-to-access alkenyl bromides, methyl ketones or carboxylic acids. What's more, the corresponding boronic acids may be used in highly stereoselective NHC-Cu-catalyzed allylic substitution reactions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Proposed Catalytic Cycle
B(pin) = (pinacolato)boron.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2. Preparation of Allene Substrates
See the Supporting Information for details.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3. Stereochemical Models
Scheme 4
Scheme 4. Enantioselective Protoboration of Aryl-Substituted Allenes
Same conditions as those in Table 1; all conv = >98%, except otherwise noted. Yields are of purified products (2 and 3; ± 5%). Site selectivities determined by analysis of 1H NMR spectra of the unpurified mixtures. Enantioselectivities determined by GC analysis. b Conv = 88%. c Conv = 91%.
Scheme 5
Scheme 5
Scheme 6
Scheme 6. Representative Functionalization Procedures,b
See the Supporting Information for experimental and analytical details. b Yield values correspond to conversion of alkyl-B(pin) to ketones or alkenyl bromides; es = enantiospecificity (product enantiomeric excess/substrate enantiomeric excess) × 100.
Scheme 7
Scheme 7. Catalytic Allylic Substitution Reactions
Ar = 2,4,6-(i-Pr)3C6H2.

References

    1. Yus M.; Gonzalez-Gomez J. C.; Foubelo F. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 5595. - PubMed
    1. For recent reviews on enantioselective protonations, see:

    2. Blanchet J.; Baudoux J.; Amere M.; Lasne M.-C.; Rouden J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 5493.
    3. Mohr J. T.; Hong A. Y.; Stoltz B. M. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 359. - PMC - PubMed
    4. For a recent relevant report, see:

    5. Cheon C. H.; Kanno O.; Toste F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 13248. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nishimura T.; Hirabayashi S.; Yasuhara Y.; Hayashi T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2556. - PubMed
    2. Sawano T.; Ou K.; Nishimura T.; Hayashi T. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 8986. - PubMed
    1. Lee Y.; Hoveyda A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3160. - PMC - PubMed
    2. Lee Y.; Jang H.; Hoveyda A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 18234. - PMC - PubMed
    3. Coberán R.; Mszar N. M.; Hoveyda A. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7079. - PubMed
    4. Meng F.; Jang H.; Hoveyda A. H. Chem.—Eur. J. 2013, 19, 3204. - PubMed
    5. See also:

    6. Matsuda N.; Hirano K.; Satoh T.; Miura M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 4934. - PubMed
    7. Meng F.; Haeffner J.; Hoveyda A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11304. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meng F.; Jung B.; Haeffner F.; Hoveyda A. H. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 1414. - PMC - PubMed
    2. For related studies, see:

    3. Yuan W.; Ma S. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 1867.
    4. Semba K.; Shinomiya M.; Fujihara T.; Terao J.; Tsuji Y. Chem.—Eur. J. 2013, 19, 7125. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources