Reply to Smith: On distinguishing between models, hypotheses, and theoretical frameworks
- PMID: 25157385
- PMCID: PMC4104893
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1408909111
Reply to Smith: On distinguishing between models, hypotheses, and theoretical frameworks
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Comment on
-
Particularism and the retreat from theory in the archaeology of agricultural origins.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 29;111(17):6171-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308938110. Epub 2014 Apr 21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. PMID: 24753601 Free PMC article.
-
Failure of optimal foraging theory to appeal to researchers working on the origins of agriculture worldwide.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 15;111(28):E2829. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1408208111. Epub 2014 Jun 16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. PMID: 24979801 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Zeder MA. The broad spectrum revolution at 40: Resource diversity, intensification, and an alternative to optimal foraging explanations. J Anthropol Archaeol. 2012;31(3):241–264.
-
- Broughton JM, Cannon MD, Bartelink EJ. Evolutionary ecology, resource depression, and niche construction theory: Applications to central California hunter-gatherers and Mimbres-Mogollon agriculturalists. J Archaeol Method Theory. 2010;17(4):371–421.
-
- Smith BD. A cultural niche construction theory of initial domestication. Biol Theory. 2011;6(3):260–271.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
