Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;61(3):149-55.
doi: 10.1080/07448481.2013.776052.

Use and perception of electronic cigarettes among college students

Craig W Trumbo  1 , Raquel Harper
Affiliations

Use and perception of electronic cigarettes among college students

Craig W Trumbo et al. J Am Coll Health. 2013.

Abstract

Objective: This study provides insight into how electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) may affect the social normative environment for tobacco use among college students.

Participants: Participants were 244 freshman and sophomore students.

Methods: Students completed an online self-report survey in April 2011.

Results: There is a higher acceptance rate of e-cigarette smoking in public than traditional tobacco. For intention to use an e-cigarette, the strongest predictor is current tobacco use, followed by a positive orientation toward public use of e-cigarettes. Positive orientation toward public use of e-cigarettes is significantly predicted by the use of alternate tobacco, intention to use or try e-cigarettes, positive orientation toward public use of tobacco, positive attitude toward e-cigarettes, positive perception of social norms for use of e-cigarettes, and favorable orientation toward e-cigarettes as an innovation.

Conclusions: These models suggest attitudinal, social normative, innovation, and behavioral factors may combine to bring the e-cigarette into wider use among college students.

Keywords: attitudes; diffusion of innovations; electronic cigarettes; smoking laws; social norms.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fairchild A, Colgrove J. Out of the ashes: the life, death, and rebirth of the "safer" cigarette in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb;94(2):192–204. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pollay RW, Dewhirst T. The dark side of marketing seemingly "Light" cigarettes: successful images and failed fact. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11(Suppl 1):I18–I31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hickman N, Klonoff EA, Landrine H, et al. Preliminary investigation of the advertising and availability of PREPs, the new"safe" tobacco products. J Behav Med. 2004 Aug;27(4):413–424. - PubMed
    1. Ayers JW, Ribisl KM, Brownstein JS. Tracking the rise in popularity of electronic nicotine delivery systems (electronic cigarettes) using search query surveillance. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Apr;40(4):448–453. - PubMed
    1. Cahn Z, Siegel M. Electronic cigarettes as a harm reduction strategy for tobacco control: a step forward or a repeat of past mistakes? J Public Health Policy. 2010 Feb;32(1):16–31. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources