5-year longitudinal followup after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings
- PMID: 25158274
- PMCID: PMC4272663
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.089
5-year longitudinal followup after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings
Abstract
Purpose: Few studies have characterized longer-term outcomes after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings.
Materials and methods: Women completing 2-year participation in a randomized equivalence trial who had not undergone surgical re-treatment for stress urinary incontinence were invited to participate in a 5-year observational cohort. The primary outcome, treatment success, was defined as no re-treatment or self-reported stress incontinence symptoms. Secondary outcomes included urinary symptoms and quality of life, satisfaction, sexual function and adverse events.
Results: Of 597 women 404 (68%) from the original trial enrolled in the study. Five years after surgical treatment success was 7.9% greater in women assigned to the retropubic sling compared to the transobturator sling (51.3% vs 43.4%, 95% CI -1.4, 17.2), not meeting prespecified criteria for equivalence. Satisfaction decreased during 5 years but remained high and similar between arms (retropubic sling 79% vs transobturator sling 85%, p=0.15). Urinary symptoms and quality of life worsened with time (p <0.001), and women with a retropubic sling reported greater urinary urgency (p=0.001), more negative impact on quality of life (p=0.02) and worse sexual function (p=0.001). There was no difference in the proportion of women experiencing at least 1 adverse event (p=0.17). Seven new mesh erosions were noted (retropubic sling 3, transobturator sling 4).
Conclusions: Treatment success decreased during 5 years for retropubic and transobturator slings, and did not meet the prespecified criteria for equivalence with retropubic demonstrating a slight benefit. However, satisfaction remained high in both arms. Women undergoing a transobturator sling procedure reported more sustained improvement in urinary symptoms and sexual function. New mesh erosions occurred in both arms over time, although at a similarly low rate.
Keywords: stress; suburethral slings; urinary incontinence.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Re: 5-year longitudinal follow-up after retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings.Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):348. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.018. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25760251 No abstract available.
-
Words of wisdom. Re: 5-year longitudinal followup after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings.Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):817-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.053. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25765214 No abstract available.
References
-
- Ward KL, Hilton P. Uk, Ireland TVTTG. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2008;115:226–33. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- U01 DK 58225/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60393/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK058234/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK58234/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060393/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60379/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060380/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060397/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60380/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60395/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060401/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK058229/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060395/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60397/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK58231/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060379/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60401/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- NIH NIDDK 1U10 DK60379-01/PHS HHS/United States
- U01 DK58229/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK058225/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK058231/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
