Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep:242:293-298.
doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

Evaluation of anogenital injuries using white and UV-light among adult volunteers following consensual sexual intercourse

Affiliations

Evaluation of anogenital injuries using white and UV-light among adult volunteers following consensual sexual intercourse

Minna Joki-Erkkilä et al. Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: New clinical forensic examination techniques for sexual assaults have not been introduced over the last few decades. We evaluated the benefit of ultraviolet light compared to white light for detecting minor anogenital injuries and scars, following consensual sexual intercourse among adult volunteers.

Design: A prospective study comparing female genital findings utilising white and ultraviolet light. A colposcopy with photographic documentation was used.

Setting: Personal invitation to healthcare students, hospital employees or acquaintances to volunteer for a gynecological examination, with a focus on clinical forensic aspects.

Participants: Eighty-eight adult female volunteers were recruited for the study. The examination was performed after consensual intercourse. Age ranged from 20 to 52 years (median 26.5 years).

Main outcome measures: Presence of acute findings and scars in the genital area using white and UV-light.

Results: Acute genital injury rate was 14.8% under white light colposcopy and 23.0% using UV light. Submucosal hemorrhages in the genital area were documented significantly better under UV-light than white light (14.9% vs. 6.8%; p=0.016), whereas petechiaes (4.5%) and abrasions (2.3%) were detected using either method. UV-light revealed significantly more often delivery-associated genital scars compared to white light (39.8% vs. 31.8%; p=0.016). Furthermore, 10 out of 31 (33.3%) women had no residual anogenital skin or mucosal surface findings, despite a prior episiotomy or rupture of the vaginal outlet wall during delivery, supporting its enormous ability to heal even after major trauma.

Conclusions: UV-light may provide additional value for the evaluation of physical findings in clinical forensic examinations after sexual assault, and is especially useful in detecting otherwise invisible early submucosal hemorrhages and scars.

Keywords: Consensual intercourse; Genital injuries; Genital scars; Sexual assault; Submucosal hemorrhages; Ultraviolet (UV)-light.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources