Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Aug 12:5:867.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00867. eCollection 2014.

From computers to cultivation: reconceptualizing evolutionary psychology

Affiliations
Review

From computers to cultivation: reconceptualizing evolutionary psychology

Louise Barrett et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Does evolutionary theorizing have a role in psychology? This is a more contentious issue than one might imagine, given that, as evolved creatures, the answer must surely be yes. The contested nature of evolutionary psychology lies not in our status as evolved beings, but in the extent to which evolutionary ideas add value to studies of human behavior, and the rigor with which these ideas are tested. This, in turn, is linked to the framework in which particular evolutionary ideas are situated. While the framing of the current research topic places the brain-as-computer metaphor in opposition to evolutionary psychology, the most prominent school of thought in this field (born out of cognitive psychology, and often known as the Santa Barbara school) is entirely wedded to the computational theory of mind as an explanatory framework. Its unique aspect is to argue that the mind consists of a large number of functionally specialized (i.e., domain-specific) computational mechanisms, or modules (the massive modularity hypothesis). Far from offering an alternative to, or an improvement on, the current perspective, we argue that evolutionary psychology is a mainstream computational theory, and that its arguments for domain-specificity often rest on shaky premises. We then go on to suggest that the various forms of e-cognition (i.e., embodied, embedded, enactive) represent a true alternative to standard computational approaches, with an emphasis on "cognitive integration" or the "extended mind hypothesis" in particular. We feel this offers the most promise for human psychology because it incorporates the social and historical processes that are crucial to human "mind-making" within an evolutionarily informed framework. In addition to linking to other research areas in psychology, this approach is more likely to form productive links to other disciplines within the social sciences, not least by encouraging a healthy pluralism in approach.

Keywords: cognition; cognitive integration; evolutionary psychology; extended mind; modules.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bach-y-Rita P., Collins C. C., Saunders F. A., White B., Scadden L. (1969). Vision substitution by tactile image projection. Nature 221 963–964 10.1038/221963a0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bach-y-Rita P., Tyler M. E., Kaczmarek K. A. (2003). Seeing with the brain. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 15 285–295 10.1207/S15327590IJHC1502_6 - DOI
    1. Bach-y-Rita P., W Kercel S. (2003). Sensory substitution and the human–machine interface. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7 541–546 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakhurst D. (2011). The Formation of Reason. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 10.1002/9781444395600 - DOI
    1. Barrett H. C. (2006). “Modularity and design reincarnation,” in The Innate Mind: Culture and Cognition eds Carruthers P., Laurence S., Stich S. P. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 199–217

LinkOut - more resources