Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug 27;9(8):e103138.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103138. eCollection 2014.

Can plants grow on Mars and the moon: a growth experiment on Mars and moon soil simulants

Affiliations

Can plants grow on Mars and the moon: a growth experiment on Mars and moon soil simulants

G W Wieger Wamelink et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

When humans will settle on the moon or Mars they will have to eat there. Food may be flown in. An alternative could be to cultivate plants at the site itself, preferably in native soils. We report on the first large-scale controlled experiment to investigate the possibility of growing plants in Mars and moon soil simulants. The results show that plants are able to germinate and grow on both Martian and moon soil simulant for a period of 50 days without any addition of nutrients. Growth and flowering on Mars regolith simulant was much better than on moon regolith simulant and even slightly better than on our control nutrient poor river soil. Reflexed stonecrop (a wild plant); the crops tomato, wheat, and cress; and the green manure species field mustard performed particularly well. The latter three flowered, and cress and field mustard also produced seeds. Our results show that in principle it is possible to grow crops and other plant species in Martian and Lunar soil simulants. However, many questions remain about the simulants' water carrying capacity and other physical characteristics and also whether the simulants are representative of the real soils.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Design of the experiment with the first ten blocks the west oriented part of the experiment and the second ten blocks the east oriented part of the experiment.
For abbreviations of the species see Table 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Block 2 of the experiment, with randomly placed pots, 14 days after the start of the experiment.
Each block contains 42 pots. Block 12 is visible in the background. The labels in the pots show the pot number, the species (from left to right on the first row Yellow sweet clover (twice), Leopards bane, Field Mustard, Carrot and Red fescue) and the soil type (L for moon or Lunar, M for Mars and E for Earth) combined with the block number (2).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Percentage germination, leave formers, plants forming flowers and plants still alive after 50 days per species.
All results are after 50 days and percentages are based on all 100 seeds per plant species-soil type combination Pairwise differences are displayed by a line which joins soil types which are significantly different at the 1% (thin line) and 0.1% (thick line) significance level. Background information can be found in Table S1 and S2.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Average biomass results per species at the end of the 50 day experiment and the resulting aboveground belowground biomass ratio.
Biomasses are given in mg dry weight on 10 log scale. The triangle indicates an outlier for Lupine (above/below 19.7). For Common vetch there is no ratio given because both above- and belowground biomass are zero. Pairwise differences are displayed by a line which joins soil types which are significantly different at the 1% (thin line) and 0.1% (thick line) significance level. Background information can be found in Table S1 and S2.

References

    1. Stevens CJ, Manning P, van den Berg LJL, de Graaf MCC, Wamelink GWW, et al. (2011) Ecosystem responses to reduced and oxidised nitrogen inputs in European terrestrial habitats. Environmental Pollution 159: 665–676. - PubMed
    1. Palomba E, Zinzi A, Cloutis E-A, D'Amore M, Grassi D, et al. (2009) Evidence for Mg-rich carbonates on Mars from a 3.9 lm absorption feature. Icarus 203: 58–65.
    1. Muller O (1974) Solar wind nitrogen and indigenous nitrogen in Apollo 17 lunar samples. Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf. 5th, Vol. 2, 1907–1918. Pergamon Press.
    1. Parnell J (2005) Extraction of organic signatures from carbonates and evaporites: from mineral deposits to Mars. Proceedings of the Geologists Association 116: 281–291.
    1. Brack A, Pillinger CT (1998) Life on Mars: chemical arguments and clues from Martian meteorites. Extremophilest 2: 313–319. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources