Embryo vitrification using a novel semi-automated closed system yields in vitro outcomes equivalent to the manual Cryotop method
- PMID: 25164022
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu214
Embryo vitrification using a novel semi-automated closed system yields in vitro outcomes equivalent to the manual Cryotop method
Abstract
Study question: Can the equilibration steps prior to embryo vitrification be automated?
Summary answer: We have developed the 'Gavi' system which automatically performs equilibration steps before closed system vitrification on up to four embryos at a time and gives in vitro outcomes equivalent to the manual Cryotop method.
What is known already: Embryo cryopreservation is an essential component of a successful assisted reproduction clinic, with vitrification providing excellent embryo survival and pregnancy outcomes. However, vitrification is a manual, labour-intensive and highly skilled procedure, and results can vary between embryologists and clinics. A closed system whereby the embryo does not come in direct contact with liquid nitrogen is preferred by many clinics and is a regulatory requirement in some countries.
Study design, size, duration: The Gavi system, an automation instrument with a novel closed system device, was used to equilibrate embryos prior to vitrification. Outcomes for embryos automatically processed with the Gavi system were compared with those processed with the manual Cryotop method and with fresh (non-vitrified) controls.
Participants/materials, setting, methods: The efficacy of the Gavi system (Alpha model) was assessed for mouse (Quackenbush Swiss and F1 C57BL/6J x CBA) zygotes, cleavage stage embryos and blastocysts, and for donated human vitrified-warmed blastocysts. The main outcomes assessed included recovery, survival and in vitro embryo development after vitrification-warming. Cooling and warming rates were measured using a thermocouple probe.
Main results and the role of chance: Mouse embryos vitrified after processing with the automated Gavi system achieved equivalent in vitro outcomes to that of Cryotop controls. For example, for mouse blastocysts both the Gavi system (n = 176) and manual Cryotop method (n = 172) gave a 99% recovery rate, of which 54 and 50%, respectively, progressed to fully hatched blastocysts 48 h after warming. The outcomes for human blastocysts processed with the Gavi system (n = 23) were also equivalent to Cryotop controls (n = 13) including 100% recovery for both groups, of which 17 and 15%, respectively, progressed to fully hatched blastocysts 48 h after warming. The cooling and warming rates achieved with the Gavi system were 14 136°C/min and 11 239°C/min, respectively.
Limitations, reasons for caution: Testing of the Gavi system described here was limited to in vitro development of embryos from two mouse strains and a limited number of human embryos. Validation of Gavi system advanced production models is now required to confirm the success of semi-automated vitrification, including clinical evaluation of pregnancy outcomes from the transfer of Gavi vitrified-warmed human embryos.
Wider implications of the findings: The Gavi system has the potential to revolutionize and standardize vitrification of embryos and oocytes. The success of the Gavi system shows that it is possible to semi-automate complicated labour-intensive ART methods and processes, and opens up the possibility for further improvements in clinical outcomes and efficiencies in the ART clinic.
Study funding/competing interests: This study was funded by Genea Ltd. S.B., N.M.T., T.T.P., S.J.M., M.C.B. and T.S. are shareholders of Genea Ltd. E.V., C.H., C.L., S.R.L. and S.M.D. are shareholders of Planet Innovation Pty Ltd. The remaining authors are employees of either Genea Ltd. or Planet Innovation Pty Ltd.
Keywords: IVF; automation; embryo; standardization; vitrification.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
A randomised, multi-center, open trial comparing a semi-automated closed vitrification system with a manual open system in women undergoing IVF.Hum Reprod. 2021 Jul 19;36(8):2101-2110. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab140. Hum Reprod. 2021. PMID: 34131726 Clinical Trial.
-
Barcode tagging of human oocytes and embryos to prevent mix-ups in assisted reproduction technologies.Hum Reprod. 2014 Jan;29(1):18-28. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det409. Epub 2013 Nov 13. Hum Reprod. 2014. PMID: 24227078
-
Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2794-801. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu246. Epub 2014 Oct 14. Hum Reprod. 2014. PMID: 25316444
-
A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos.Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):536-54. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms016. Epub 2012 Apr 25. Hum Reprod Update. 2012. PMID: 22537859 Review.
-
Vitrification can be more favorable than slow cooling.Fertil Steril. 2002 Sep;78(3):449-54. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03305-8. Fertil Steril. 2002. PMID: 12215314 Review.
Cited by
-
A new, simple, automatic vitrification device: preliminary results with murine and bovine oocytes and embryos.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Jul;35(7):1161-1168. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1210-9. Epub 2018 May 25. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018. PMID: 29802518 Free PMC article.
-
A comprehensive review and update on human fertility cryopreservation methods and tools.Front Vet Sci. 2023 Apr 18;10:1151254. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1151254. eCollection 2023. Front Vet Sci. 2023. PMID: 37143497 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vitrification of human blastocysts for couples undergoing assisted reproduction: an updated review.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 May 17;12:1398049. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1398049. eCollection 2024. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024. PMID: 38827525 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Future of IVF: The New Normal in Human Reproduction.Reprod Sci. 2022 Mar;29(3):849-856. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00829-3. Epub 2022 Jan 3. Reprod Sci. 2022. PMID: 34981459 Free PMC article.
-
Integration of Bioengineered Tools in Assisted Reproductive Technologies.Adv Healthc Mater. 2025 Aug;14(21):e2500918. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202500918. Epub 2025 Jun 16. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025. PMID: 40519072 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials