Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug;10(8):20140473.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0473.

Temperature alters food web body-size structure

Affiliations

Temperature alters food web body-size structure

Jean P Gibert et al. Biol Lett. 2014 Aug.

Abstract

The increased temperature associated with climate change may have important effects on body size and predator-prey interactions. The consequences of these effects for food web structure are unclear because the relationships between temperature and aspects of food web structure such as predator-prey body-size relationships are unknown. Here, we use the largest reported dataset for marine predator-prey interactions to assess how temperature affects predator-prey body-size relationships among different habitats ranging from the tropics to the poles. We found that prey size selection depends on predator body size, temperature and the interaction between the two. Our results indicate that (i) predator-prey body-size ratios decrease with predator size at below-average temperatures and increase with predator size at above-average temperatures, and (ii) that the effect of temperature on predator-prey body-size structure will be stronger at small and large body sizes and relatively weak at intermediate sizes. This systematic interaction may help to simplify forecasting the potentially complex consequences of warming on interaction strengths and food web stability.

Keywords: body-size ratios; food web structure; global warming; temperature; temperature size rule.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Left: prey body size (log) against predator body size (log) across marine habitats. Red (T = 29°C), black (T = 15°C) and blue lines (T = −1.3°C) represent predicted curves from the best model. 95% confidence intervals are displayed in grey. Right: same as in left for a subset of the habitats studied (coastal bay is not significant). (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The effect of temperature on prey and predator body size. Red and blue lines represent the slope of the predator–prey body size relationship for warm (red) and cold (blue) temperatures. Black arrows represent body-size changes with temperature.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lurgi M, López BC, Montoya JM. 2012. Climate change impacts on body size and food web structure on mountain ecosystems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 3050–3057. (10.1098/rstb.2012.0239) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB. 2004. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85, 1771–1789. (10.1890/03-9000) - DOI
    1. Brose U, et al. 2006. Consumer–resource body-size relationships in natural food webs. Ecology 87, 2411–2417. (10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2411:CBRINF]2.0.CO;2) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Memmott J, Martinez ND, Cohen JE. 2000. Predators, parasitoids and pathogens: species richness, trophic generality and body sizes in a natural food web. J. Anim. Ecol. 69, 1–15. (10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00367.x) - DOI
    1. Jonsson T, Cohen JE, Carpenter SR. 2005. Food webs, body size, and species abundance in ecological community description. Adv. Ecol. Res. 36, 1–84. (10.1016/S0065-2504(05)36001-6) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources