Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Aug 1:6:63.
doi: 10.12703/P6-63. eCollection 2014.

Different yet similar: evolution of imprinting in flowering plants and mammals

Affiliations
Review

Different yet similar: evolution of imprinting in flowering plants and mammals

Nuno D Pires et al. F1000Prime Rep. .

Abstract

Genomic imprinting refers to a form of epigenetic gene regulation whereby alleles are differentially expressed in a parent-of-origin-dependent manner. Imprinting evolved independently in flowering plants and in therian mammals in association with the elaboration of viviparity and a placental habit. Despite the striking differences in plant and animal reproduction, genomic imprinting shares multiple characteristics between them. In both groups, imprinted expression is controlled, at least in part, by DNA methylation and chromatin modifications in cis-regulatory regions, and many maternally and paternally expressed genes display complementary dosage-dependent effects during embryogenesis. This suggests that genomic imprinting evolved in response to similar selective pressures in flowering plants and mammals. Nevertheless, there are important differences between plant and animal imprinting. In particular, genomic imprinting has been shown to be more flexible and evolutionarily labile in plants. In mammals, imprinted genes are organized mainly in highly conserved clusters, whereas in plants they occur in isolation throughout the genome and are affected by local gene duplications. There is a large degree of intra- and inter-specific variation in imprinted gene expression in plants. These differences likely reflect the distinct life cycles and the different evolutionary dynamics that shape plant and animal genomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Timescale for the evolution of imprinting in animals and plants

References

    1. Raissig MT, Baroux C, Grossniklaus U. Regulation and flexibility of genomic imprinting during seed development. Plant Cell. 2011;23:16–26. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.081018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kermicle J. Dependence of the R-mottled aleurone phenotype in maize on mode of sexual transmission. Genetics. 1970;66:69–85. - PMC - PubMed
    2. http://f1000.com/prime/718486711

    1. Nishiyama I, Yabuno T. Triple fusion of the primary endosperm nucleus as a cause of interspecific cross-incompatibility in Avena. Euphytica. 1979;28:57–65. doi: 10.1007/BF00029173. - DOI
    1. Johnston S, den Nijs T, Peloquin S, Hanneman Jr., R The significance of genic balance to endosperm development in interspecific crosses. Theor Appl Genet. 1980;57:5–9. - PubMed
    1. Lin BY. Ploidy barrier to endosperm development in maize. Genetics. 1984;107:103–15. - PMC - PubMed