Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov;53(4):671-6.
doi: 10.1007/s00411-014-0565-2. Epub 2014 Aug 29.

Effect of varying dose-per-pulse and average dose rate in X-ray beam irradiation on cultured cell survival

Affiliations

Effect of varying dose-per-pulse and average dose rate in X-ray beam irradiation on cultured cell survival

G Lasio et al. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Characterizing the biological effects of flattening filter-free (FFF) X-ray beams from linear accelerators is of importance, due to their increasing clinical availability. The purpose of this work is to determine whether in vitro cell survival is affected by the higher dose-per-pulse present in FFF beams in comparison with flattened X-ray beams. A Varian TrueBeam(®) linear accelerator was used to irradiate the T98G, V79-4 and U87-MG cell lines with a single fraction of 5 Gy or 10 Gy doses of X-rays. Beams with energies of 6 MegaVolt (MV), 6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF were used, with doses-per-pulse as measured at the monitor chamber of 0.28, 0.78 and 1.31 mGy/pulse for 6 MV, 6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF, respectively. The dose delivered to each Petri dish was verified by means of ionization chamber measurements. No statistically significant effects on survival fraction were observed for any of the cell lines considered, either as a function of dose-per-pulse, average dose rate or total dose delivered. Biological effects of higher instantaneous rates should not be excluded on the basis of in vitro experimental results such as the ones presented in this work. The next step toward an assessment of the biological impact of FFF beams will require in vivo studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2012 Jun;35(2):151-7 - PubMed
    1. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Feb 21;58(4):1075-82 - PubMed
    1. Radiother Oncol. 2011 Oct;101(1):226-32 - PubMed
    1. Radiat Res. 1973 May;54(2):316-27 - PubMed
    1. Radiother Oncol. 2010 Jun;95(3):261-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources