Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Sep 18;20(1):400-9.
doi: 10.2119/molmed.2014.00145.

Biologic treatment of mild and moderate intervertebral disc degeneration

Affiliations
Review

Biologic treatment of mild and moderate intervertebral disc degeneration

Elias S Vasiliadis et al. Mol Med. .

Abstract

Disc degeneration is the most common cause of back pain in adults and has enormous socioeconomic implications. Conservative management is ineffective in most cases, and results of surgical treatment have not yet reached desirable standards. Biologic treatment options are an alternative to the above conventional management and have become very attractive in recent years. The present review highlights the currently available biologic treatment options in mild and moderate disc degeneration, where a potential for regeneration still exists. Biologic treatment options include protein-based and cell-based therapies. Protein-based therapies involve administration of biologic factors into the intervertebral disc to enhance matrix synthesis, delay degeneration or impede inflammation. These factors can be delivered by an intradiscal injection, alone or in combination with cells or tissue scaffolds and by gene therapy. Cell-based therapies comprise treatment strategies that aim to either replace necrotic or apoptotic cells, or minimize cell death. Cell-based therapies are more appropriate in moderate stages of degenerated disc disease, when cell population is diminished; therefore, the effect of administration of growth factors would be insufficient. Although clinical application of biologic treatments is far from being an everyday practice, the existing studies demonstrate promising results that will allow the future design of more sophisticated methods of biologic intervention to treat intervertebral disc degeneration.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. MacLean JJ, et al. Effects of immobilization and dynamic compression on intervertebral disc cell gene expression in vivo. Spine. 2003;28:973–81. - PubMed
    1. Hadjipavlou AG, Tzermiadianos MN, Bogduk N, Zindrick MR. The pathophysiology of disc degeneration: a critical review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1261–70. - PubMed
    1. Le Maitre CL, Pockert A, Buttle DJ, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA. Matrix synthesis and degradation in human intervertebral disc degeneration. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35:652–5. - PubMed
    1. Radcliff KE, et al. Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions. Spine J. 2013;13:1339–49. - PubMed
    1. Roberts S, Evans H, Trivedi J, Menage J. Histology and pathology of the human intervertebral disc. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2006;88(Suppl 2):10–14. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources