EAU standardised medical terminology for urologic imaging: a taxonomic approach
- PMID: 25171904
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.014
EAU standardised medical terminology for urologic imaging: a taxonomic approach
Abstract
Background: The terminology and abbreviations used in urologic imaging have generally been adopted on an ad hoc basis by different speciality groups; however, there is a need for shared nomenclature to facilitate clinical communication and collaborative research.
Objective: This work reviews the current nomenclature for urologic imaging used in clinical practice and proposes a taxonomy and terminology for urologic imaging studies.
Design, setting, and participants: A list of terms used in urologic imaging were compiled from guidelines published by the European Association of Urology and the American Urological Association and from the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Terms searched were grouped into broad categories based on technology, and imaging terms were further stratified based on the anatomic extent, contrast or phases, technique or modifiers, and combinations or fusions. Terms that had a high degree of utilisation were classified as accepted.
Results and limitations: We propose a new taxonomy to define a more useful and acceptable nomenclature model acceptable to all health professionals involved in urology. The major advantage of a taxonomic approach to the classification of urologic imaging studies is that it provides a flexible framework for classifying the modifications of current imaging modalities and allows the incorporation of new imaging modalities. The adoption of this hierarchical classification model ranging from the most general to the most detailed descriptions should facilitate hierarchical searches of the medical literature using both general and specific terms. This work is limited in its scope, as it is not currently all-inclusive. This will hopefully be addressed by future modification as others embrace the concept and work towards uniformity in nomenclature.
Conclusions: This paper provides a noncomprehensive list of the most widely used terms across different specialties. This list can be used as the basis for further discussion, development, and enhancement.
Patient summary: In this paper we describe a classification system for urologic imaging terms with the aim of aiding health professionals and ensuring that the terms used are more consistent.
Keywords: Computed tomography; EAU guidelines; Magnetic resonance imaging; Positron emission tomography; Radiographs; Taxonomy; Terminology; Ultrasound; Urologic imaging.
Copyright © 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations.Eur Urol. 2012 Feb;61(2):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.033. Epub 2011 Oct 29. Eur Urol. 2012. PMID: 22074761
-
EAU guidelines on robotic and single-site surgery in urology.Eur Urol. 2013 Aug;64(2):277-91. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.034. Epub 2013 May 25. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 23764016 Review.
-
EAU guidelines on primary urethral carcinoma.Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):823-30. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.044. Epub 2013 Apr 2. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 23582479 Review.
-
Validation of the Clavien-Dindo Grading System in Urology by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Ad Hoc Panel.Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jul;4(4):608-613. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Mar 7. Eur Urol Focus. 2018. PMID: 28753862 Review.
-
EAU guidelines on laser technologies.Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):783-95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Jan 17. Eur Urol. 2012. PMID: 22285403 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical