Left ventricular dysfunction after mitral valve repair--the fallacy of "normal" preoperative myocardial function
- PMID: 25173130
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.029
Left ventricular dysfunction after mitral valve repair--the fallacy of "normal" preoperative myocardial function
Abstract
Objective: A proportion of patients experience a decrease in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) after mitral valve repair; however, predictors and long-term consequences remain unclear.
Methods: A study of 1705 patients with severe, degenerative mitral valve regurgitation and normal preoperative EF (>60%) undergoing mitral valve repair from 1993 to 2012 was performed. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the predictors of early postoperative LV dysfunction (EF < 50%) and long-term survival, respectively.
Results: Postoperative outcomes were comparable between patients; however, those with an EF of <50% (n = 314, 18.4%) had significantly greater enlargement in systolic dimension (left ventricular end-systolic diameter, -0.6 vs 4.3 mm; P < .001) and decrease in right ventricular systolic pressure (-2.7 vs -7.8 mm Hg; P < .001) immediately after repair. On longitudinal follow-up, early LV impairment persisted, with EF recovering to preoperative levels (>60%) in only one third of patients with postrepair EF <50% versus two thirds of those with an EF of ≥ 50% (P < .001). The overall survival at 5, 10, and 15 years of follow-up was 95%, 85%, and 70.8%, respectively. Although early postoperative EF < 50% was not a significant determinant of late survival, when adjusting for older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09), hypertension (HR, 1.38), New York Heart Association class III or IV (HR, 1.71), and preoperative atrial fibrillation (HR, 2.33), postoperative EF < 40% conferred a 70% increase in the hazard of late death (HR, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.92; P = .037). A preoperative right ventricular systolic pressure >49 mm Hg and left ventricular end-systolic diameter >36 mm were independently associated with a 4.4- and 6.5-fold increased risk of developing a postoperative EF < 40% (P < .001, for both).
Conclusions: De novo postoperative LV dysfunction is not uncommon in patients with "normal" preoperative EF undergoing mitral valve repair. LV dysfunction can persist, impairing recovery of LV size, function, and survival. The consideration of mitral repair before the onset of excessive LV dilation or pulmonary hypertension, even in those with preserved EF, seems warranted.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Discussion.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;148(6):2760-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.030. Epub 2014 Aug 28. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014. PMID: 25173120 No abstract available.
-
Left ventricular dysfunction after mitral valve repair: predetermined or caused?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;149(3):940. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.09.066. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 25827380 No abstract available.
-
Better to avoid disaster than rescue defeat--ventricular dysfunction after delayed mitral valve repair.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;149(3):941-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.11.066. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 25827381 No abstract available.
-
Changes in left ventricular volume and decline in ejection fraction after degenerative mitral valve repair: The math makes sense.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;150(3):741-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.075. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 26319470 No abstract available.
-
Left ventricular function after mitral surgery: Time to focus on intraoperative management?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;150(3):741. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.04.046. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 26319471 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
