Bioresorbable vascular scaffold for coronary in-stent restenosis: a novel concept
- PMID: 25173206
- PMCID: PMC4150045
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2014.05.016
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold for coronary in-stent restenosis: a novel concept
Abstract
The management of patients with significant in-stent restenosis (ISR) with drug-eluting stent is still not well defined. Various treatment modalities include plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), metallic stent, cutting or scoring balloon and drug-eluting balloon (DEB). Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) is the latest technology for the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions. The use of BVS in ISR is based on the rationale of local drug delivery as achieved by DEB without the permanent bi-layer of metal and also stabilizes dissection flaps and prevents acute recoil as provided by metallic stent. To the best of our knowledge this is the first case report of the use of BVS in patient with ISR.
Keywords: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold; Drug-eluting balloon; Drug-eluting stent; In-stent restenosis.
Copyright © 2014 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting stents or drug eluting balloon for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: 1-Year follow-up of a propensity score matching comparison (the BIORESOLVE-ISR Study).Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 1;92(4):668-677. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27473. Epub 2018 Jan 22. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 29356269
-
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds for Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: The RIBS VI Study.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 25;10(18):1841-1851. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.064. Epub 2017 Aug 30. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28866036
-
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation for the Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Multicenter Italian Experience.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;9(4):e003148. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003148. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 27059683
-
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):537-544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00979-4. Epub 2015 Nov 17. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 26597771 Review.
-
Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Balloons for Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: A Meta-Analysis of 8 Randomized Controlled Trials.Angiology. 2016 Aug;67(7):612-21. doi: 10.1177/0003319715611826. Epub 2015 Oct 18. Angiology. 2016. PMID: 26483569 Review.
Cited by
-
In-Stent Restenosis: Pathophysiology and Treatment.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2016 Feb;18(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s11936-015-0433-7. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2016. PMID: 26781658
References
-
- Dangas G.D., Claessen B.E., Caixeta A., Sanidas E.A., Mintz G.S., Mehran R. In-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1897–1907. - PubMed
-
- Torguson R., Sabate M., Deible R. Intravascular brachytherapy versus drug-eluting stents for the treatment of patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:1340–1344. - PubMed
-
- Lemos P.A., van Mieghem C.A., Arampatzis C.A. Post-sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis treated with repeat percutaneous intervention: late angiographic and clinical outcomes. Circulation. 2004;109:2500–2502. - PubMed
-
- Chatani K., Muramatsu T., Tsukahara R. Predictive factors of re-restenosis after repeated sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for SES restenosis and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for SES restenosis. J Interv Cardiol. 2009;22:354–361. - PubMed
-
- Song H.G., Park D.W., Kim Y.H. Randomized trial of optimal treatment strategies for in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1093–1100. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources