Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan;17(1):2-17.
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu168. Epub 2014 Aug 30.

A systematic review on the impact of point-of-sale tobacco promotion on smoking

Affiliations

A systematic review on the impact of point-of-sale tobacco promotion on smoking

Lindsay Robertson et al. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: The tobacco retail environment is a crucial marketing medium for the industry. A 2009 review found evidence of a positive association between exposure to point-of-sale (POS) tobacco promotion and increased smoking and smoking susceptibility, though limitations in the evidence base were identified.

Aim and methods: We reviewed and critically appraised recent evidence documenting the influence of POS tobacco promotion, and POS tobacco display bans, on smoking-related behavior and cognitions. We reviewed original quantitative and qualitative research that examined the relationship between POS tobacco promotion and smoking prevalence, individual-level smoking and quitting and tobacco purchasing behavior, smoking susceptibility, and smoking-related cognitions.

Results: Twenty peer-reviewed studies (18 quantitative and 2 qualitative) met the inclusion criteria; each study reported findings consistent with a positive association between exposure to POS tobacco promotion and smoking or smoking susceptibility. Several studies met key criteria for causality: 4 indicated a dose-response association, 2 prospective studies were identified, and evidence from intervention studies supported the reversibility of the association. Findings were consistent across different study designs, settings, and measures.

Conclusions: The existing evidence supports a positive association between exposure to POS tobacco promotion and smoking. This review provides evidence to support the continuation of POS tobacco display bans in those jurisdictions where such legislation has been introduced and strengthens the evidence encouraging similar policies in jurisdictions without a POS display ban.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Feighery EC, Ribisl KM, Schleicher NC, Clark PI. Retailer participation in cigarette company incentive programs is related to increased levels of cigarette advertising and cheaper cigarette prices in stores. Prev Med. 2004;38:876–884. - PubMed
    1. Pollay RW. More than meets the eye: on the importance of retail cigarette merchandising. Tob Control. 2007;16:270–274. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Federal Trade Commission. Cigarette Report for 2011. Washington, DC: US Federal Trade Commission; 2013. http://www.ftc.gov/reports/federal-trade-commission-cigarette-report-2011 Accessed December 19, 2013.
    1. Bloom PN. Role of slotting fees and trade promotions in shaping how tobacco is marketed in retail stores. Tob Control. 2001;10:340–344. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lavack AM, Toth G. Tobacco point-of-purchase promotion: examining tobacco industry documents. Tob Control. 2006;15:377–384. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types