Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Dec:30:211-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

Protein aggregation and its impact on product quality

Affiliations
Review

Protein aggregation and its impact on product quality

Christopher J Roberts. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Protein pharmaceutical products are typically active as folded monomers that are composed of one or more protein chains, such as the heavy and light chains in monoclonal antibodies that are a mainstay of current drug pipelines. There are numerous possible aggregated states for a given protein, some of which are potentially useful, while most of which are considered deleterious from the perspective of pharmaceutical product quality and performance. This review provides an overview of how and why different aggregated states of proteins occur, how this potentially impacts product quality and performance, fundamental approaches to control aggregate formation, and the practical approaches that are currently used in the pharmaceutical industry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic overview of a range of different aggregated states that proteins can adopt either as folded molecule or unfolded/partially-unfolded ones. The latter typically result in aggregates that are difficult to dissociate without extreme conditions (high pressure, temperature, and/or denaturant concentration). Images for liquid-liquid and liquid-crystal phase separation (bottom left) are reproduced with permission from Ref. [8], as are those for aggregate phase separation (bottom right) from Ref. [9].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rob Aggarwal S. What’s fueling the biotech engine-2012 to 2013. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:32–39. - PubMed
    1. Smart AL, Gaisford S, Basit AW. Oral peptide and protein delivery: intestinal obstacles and commercial prospects. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014 doi: 10.1517/17425247.2014.917077. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li X, Yu M, Fan W, Gan Y, Hovgaard L, Yang M. Orally active-targeted drug delivery systems for proteins and peptides. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014 doi: 10.1517/17425247.2014.924500. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anselmo AC, Mitragotri S. An overview of clinical and commercial impact of drug delivery systems. J Control Release Off J Control Release Soc. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.053. This article provides a useful overview of a range of different drug delivery options (beyond standard injections) that have been and are being pursued in various stages of development, as well as an assessment of why some are more successful than others, and where the promising avenues are for eventually delivering protein therapeutics via next generation delivery systems. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang W. Protein aggregation and its inhibition in biopharmaceutics. Int J Pharm. 2005;289:1–30. - PubMed

Publication types