Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;21(2):307-13.
doi: 10.1007/s12253-014-9822-6. Epub 2014 Aug 31.

Replication study for the association of seven genome- GWAS-identified Loci with susceptibility to ovarian cancer in the Polish population

Affiliations

Replication study for the association of seven genome- GWAS-identified Loci with susceptibility to ovarian cancer in the Polish population

Adrianna Mostowska et al. Pathol Oncol Res. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

We investigated the previously-demonstrated association of seven genome-wide association studies (GWAS) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), including rs2072590 (HOXD-AS1), rs2665390 (TIPARP), rs10088218 and rs10098821 (8q24), rs3814113 (9p22), rs9303542 (SKAP1) and rs2363956 (ANKLE1), as risk factors of epithelial ovarian tumors (EOTs). These SNPs were genotyped in two hundred seventy three patients with EOTs and four hundred sixty four unrelated healthy females from the Polish population. We observed the lowest p values of the trend test for the 9p22 rs3814113 and 8q24 rs10098821 SNPs in patients with all subtypes of ovarian cancer (p(trend) = 0.010 and p(trend) = 0.014, respectively). There were also significant p values for the trend of the 9p22 rs3814113 and the 8q24 rs10098821 SNPs for serous histological subtypes of ovarian cancer (p(trend) = 0.006, p(trend) = 0.033, respectively). Moreover, stratification of the patients based on their histological type of cancer demonstrated, in the dominant hereditary model, a significant association of the 9p22 rs3814113 SNP with serous ovarian carcinoma OR = 0.532 (95% CI = 0.342 - 0.827, p = 0.005, p(corr) = 0.035). Despite the relatively small sample size of cases and controls, our studies confirmed some of the previously-demonstrated GWAS SNPs as genetic risk factors for EOTs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.20138. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A, Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gurung A, Hung T, Morin J, et al. Molecular abnormalities in ovarian carcinoma: clinical, morphological and therapeutic correlates. Histopathology. 2013;62:59–70. doi: 10.1111/his.12033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Danforth KN, Tworoger SS, Hecht JL, et al. Breastfeeding and risk of ovarian cancer in two prospective cohorts. Cancer Causes Control. 2007;18:517–523. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-0130-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whittemore AS, Harris R, Itnyre J, et al. Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of 12 US case–control studies. I. Methods. Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;136:1175–1183. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms