Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;16(10):942-50, 1-7.
doi: 10.1038/ncb3025. Epub 2014 Aug 31.

Mammary stem cells have myoepithelial cell properties

Affiliations

Mammary stem cells have myoepithelial cell properties

Michael D Prater et al. Nat Cell Biol. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Contractile myoepithelial cells dominate the basal layer of the mammary epithelium and are considered to be differentiated cells. However, we observe that up to 54% of single basal cells can form colonies when seeded into adherent culture in the presence of agents that disrupt actin-myosin interactions, and on average, 65% of the single-cell-derived basal colonies can repopulate a mammary gland when transplanted in vivo. This indicates that a high proportion of basal myoepithelial cells can give rise to a mammary repopulating unit (MRU). We demonstrate that myoepithelial cells, flow-sorted using two independent myoepithelial-specific reporter strategies, have MRU capacity. Using an inducible lineage-tracing approach we follow the progeny of myoepithelial cells that express α-smooth muscle actin and show that they function as long-lived lineage-restricted stem cells in the virgin state and during pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The vast majority of mouse basal cells express alpha-smooth muscle actin (αSMA). High EpCAM expression enriches for mammary stem cells and proliferating cells
(a) Flow cytometry plot showing stromal (black), luminal (blue) and basal (red) cell populations. The basal population has been subdivided into EpCAMhigh (brightest 20%) and EpCAMlow (remaining 80%) subpopulations (b) Double-sorted basal EpCAMhigh and EpCAMlow cells stained by immunocytochemistry for αSMA and isotype control inset. Mean (± SEM) of 5 independent experiments. Scale bars = 50 μm. (c) Relative mRNA transcript abundance of Acta2, Myh11 and Oxtr in basal EpCAMhigh and EpCAMlow cells as detected by real-time PCR. Data normalised to Actb and Rplp0 reference genes. Mean (± SEM) of 4 independent experiments. (d) Relative abundance of αSMA protein in basal EpCAMhigh and EpCAMlow cells as detected by Western blot (left). Data normalised to cytokeratin 14 (CK14) abundance. Mean (± SEM) of 3 independent experiments. A representative blot (right) showing protein standards (red), CK14 (55kDa) and αSMA (42kDa) bands (green). (e) Mammary repopulating unit (MRU) frequency of sorted basal EpCAMhigh and EpCAMlow cells. Data for Basal EpCAMhigh and Basal EpCAMlow pooled from 5 independent experiments. ** P = 0.0002. (f) Percentage of flow-sorted basal EpCAMhigh and EpCAMlow cells positive for IdU/BrdU. Data is presented as the mean (± SEM) of 9 independent experiments. * P = 0.04. (g) Distribution of IdU/BrdU+ cells within the basal population.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Short-term culture increases MRU numbers by ~460-fold
(a) MRU frequency in freshly isolated and post-cultured basal cells with estimated number (± SEM) of MRUs per dish. Data pooled from 5 independent experiments for non-cultured basal and from 4 independent experiments for 7-day-cultured basal cells. (b) Representative engrafted fat pads derived from non-cultured basal cells and 7-day-cultured basal cells. Scale bar = 2 mm.
Figure 3
Figure 3. A high proportion of single-cell-derived basal colonies contain a MRU
(a) Table showing single-cell cloning efficiency of basal EpCAMhigh and EpCAMlow cells and the proportion of single-cell-derived basal colonies that engrafted when transplanted into cleared mammary fat pads of NSG pups. Cloning efficiencies are presented as the mean ± SEM, with data pooled from 4 independent experiments. (b) Representative images of a GFP+ basal colony and a GFP+ engraftment from a transplanted basal colony (which was derived from a single basal EpCAMhigh cell); scale bars = 500 μm. Images of sections through an engrafted fat pad stained for various markers by immunohistochemistry; scale bars = 100 μm.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Myoepithelial cells have MRU activity
(a) Sections of mammary glands from Acta2-GFP mice (C57BL/6J) stained for αSMA and GFP by immunohistochemistry. Representative image seen in 3 independent samples. Scale bar = 100 μm. (b) Flow cytometry dot plot showing GFP+ (αSMA+) events back-gated onto the EpCAM and CD49f plot. (c) CFE of basal αSMA+ and basal αSMA cells. Mean (±SEM) of 4 independent experiments. ** P = 0.0003. (d) MRU frequency in basal αSMA+ and basal αSMA cells. Data pooled from 3 independent experiments. ** P = 0.0002. (e) Wholemount (left) and sections (center and right) of X-gal-stained mammary glands from Myh11-Cre-GFP;Rosa26LacZ virgin (left and center) and 15-day-pregnant (right) mice. Images were observed in 8 (left panel) and 4 (central and right panels) independent samples. Scale bar for left panel = 1.8 mm. Scale bar for central panel = 120 μm. Scale bar for right panel = 50 μm. (f) Flow cytometry dot plot showing resolution of total basal and basal Myh11+ cells. Five independent samples analysed. (g) X-gal-stained colonies derived from flow-sorted basal and luminal cells. Scale bar = 5 mm. (h) Mammospheres derived from basal Myh11+ and total basal cells. Scale bar = 290 μm. (i) Mammosphere forming efficiency of basal Myh11+ and total basal cells. Data showing the mean sphere-forming efficiency from one of two independent experiments is presented. Data is derived from 3 technical replicates. (j) MRU frequency in basal Myh11+ and total basal cells. Data pooled from 3 independent experiments. (k) Wholemount and section of a primary engraftment (above) developed from basal Myh11+ cells in virgin (left and central) and 12-day-pregnant (right) hosts and a secondary engraftment (below) in a virgin host. Nineteen primary and three secondary outgrowths were x-gal stained in whole mount, of which three primary and three secondary outgrowths were sectioned. Scale bars for wholemounts = 1.8 mm. Scale bars for sections = 50 μm.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Myoepithelial cell derived clones can undergo expansion within the basal layer of intact mammary glands and survive after multiple pregnancies
Experimental schedule for (b) and (c). (b) Sections of whole-mount x-gal stained mammary glands from Acta2-Cre-ERT2;Rosa26LacZ mice injected with Tamoxifen at 4 weeks and dissected 1 and 6 weeks later, as indicated. Scale bar = 52 μm (c) A graph showing the percentage of myoepithelial cell clones containing 1, 2-4 and > 4 LacZ-positive cells in the glands dissected 1 and 6 weeks after Tamoxifen injection. The values shown are means+SEM from 4 mammary fat pads at each time point. *P < 0.01. For details see On Line Methods. (d) Section of whole-mount x-gal stained mammary gland from Acta2-Cre-ERT2;Rosa26LacZ mouse injected with Tamoxifen at 4 weeks and dissected 5 weeks later, on day 8 of pregnancy. The arrows point to LacZ-positive cells in the basal layer of small lateral branches and emerging alveolar buds. Scale bar = 90 μm. (e) Experimental schedule for (f) and (g). (f) Fragments (upper panels) and sections (lower panels) of whole-mount x-gal stained mammary glands from 13-week-old virgin, 12-(P12) and 17-day-pregnant (P17) Acta2-Cre-ERT2;Rosa26LacZ mice dissected 5 and 6 weeks after Tamoxifen injection, as indicated. Arrows point to LacZ-positive alveoli. D, mammary duct, BV, blood vessel. Scale bar = 0.35 mm for upper panels and 65 μm for lower panels. (g) A graph showing the percentage of myoepithelial cell clones containing 1, 2-4 and > 4 LacZ-positive cells in the ducts from virgin and pregnant Acta2-Cre-ERT2;Rosa26LacZ mice. V1 and V2, two 13-week-old virgin mice; P12, P15 and P17, 1st pregnancy days 12, 15 and 17, respectively. The values represent means+SEM of 3 counts performed in different gland areas (for details see On Line Methods).
Figure 6
Figure 6. The progeny of myoepithelial cells is restricted to the basal cell layer and survives after multiple pregnancies
(a) A graph showing the percentage of LacZ-positive cells in basal and luminal cell populations isolated from Acta2-Cre-ERT2;Rosa26LacZ mouse and x-gal stained in suspension. V, 13-week-old virgin, P15 and P17, 1st pregnancy days 15 and 17, respectively; 3rdP6 and 3rdP15, 3rd pregnancy, days 6-7 and 15, respectively. Experimental schedule for V, P15 and P17 is shown in Figure 5e, for 3rdP6 and 3rdP15, in (g). Data shown for P15, P17 and 3rdP15 were obtained with inguinal mammary glands from one mouse, in each case, for V and 3rdP6, with pooled inguinal glands from two 13-week-old virgin and two 6-7-day-pregnant mice, respectively. (b) A mammary gland fragment from virgin Acta2-Cre-ERT2;R26mTmG mouse analyzed five weeks after Tamoxifen injection. Scale bar = 0.35 mm. (c) and (d) Flow cytometry dot plots showing GFP expression in luminal and basal cell populations isolated from virgin (c) and 1-day-lactating (d) Acta2-Cre-ERT2;R26mTmG mice. Experimental schedule for (b-d) was same as shown in Figure 5e. Red ovals indicate luminal (L) and basal (B) cell populations. (e) and (g) Experimental schedules for (f) and (h), respectively. (f) Fragment of whole-mount x-gal stained mammary gland from Acta2-Cre-ERT2;Rosa26LacZ mice injected with Tamoxifen at 4 weeks and analysed 25 weeks later, on day 16 of the involution following 2nd pregnancy (2nd Inv16). Scale bar = 0.87 mm. In (e) and (g), 1st and 2nd P,L,Inv, first and second pregnancy, lactation and involution cycles, respectively. (h) A fragment (left) and a section (right) of x-gal stained mammary glands from Acta2-Cre-ERT2;Rosa26LacZ mice injected with Tamoxifen at 4 weeks and analysed 23 weeks later, on day 15 of third pregnancy (3rdP15). Scale bar = 0.87 mm, left panel and 50 mm, right panel. Arrows in (f) and (h) point to alveoli. BV, blood vessel; D, mammary duct.

References

    1. Franke WW, et al. Intermediate-sized filaments of the prekeratin type in myoepithelial cells. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1980;84:633–654. doi:10.1083/jcb.84.3.633. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lazard D, et al. Expression of smooth muscle-specific proteins in myoepithelium and stromal myofibroblasts of normal and malignant human breast tissue. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1993;90:999–1003. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chepko G, et al. Differential alteration of stem and other cell populations in ducts and lobules of TGF[alpha] and c-Myc transgenic mouse mammary epithelium. Tissue and Cell. 2005;37:393–412. - PubMed
    1. Smith GH, Medina D. A morphologically distinct candidate for an epithelial stem cell in mouse mammary gland. Journal of Cell Science. 1988;90:173–183. - PubMed
    1. Stingl J, et al. Purification and unique properties of mammary epithelial stem cells. Nature. 2006;439:993–997. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data