Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Mar;39(3):542-5.
doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.162. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

Calorie-labelling: does it impact on calorie purchase in catering outlets and the views of young adults?

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Calorie-labelling: does it impact on calorie purchase in catering outlets and the views of young adults?

C K Nikolaou et al. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Calorie-labelling of meals has been suggested as an antiobesity measure, but evidence for impact is scarce. It might have a particular value for young adults, when weight gain is most rapid. A systematic literature review and a meta-analysis was performed to assess the effect of calorie-labelling on calories purchased. Seven studies met the inclusion and quality criteria of which six provided data allowing a meta-analysis. Three reported significant changes, all reductions in calories purchased (-38.1 to -12.4 kcal). Meta-analysis showed no overall effect, -5.8 kcal (95% confidence interval (CI)=-19.4 to 7.8 kcal) but a reduction of -124.5 kcal (95% CI=-150.7 to 113.8 kcal) among those who noticed the calorie-labelling (30-60% of customers). A questionnaire, to gauge views on calorie-labelling, was devised and sent to young adults in higher education: 1440 young adults (mean age 20.3 (s.d.=2.9) years) completed the survey. Nearly half (46%) said they would welcome calorie information in catering settings and on alcoholic drinks. Females opposing to calorie-labelling were heavier to those who did not (64.3 kg vs. 61.9 kg, P=0.03; BMI=22.4 kg m(-2) vs. 21.7 kg m(-2), P=0.02). In conclusion, the limited evidence supports a valuable effect from clearly visible calorie-labelling for obesity prevention, and it appears an attractive strategy to many young adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nutr Rev. 2009 Feb;67(2):83-94 - PubMed
    1. J Am Diet Assoc. 1998 Oct;98(10):1118-26 - PubMed
    1. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Dec 05;5:63 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 2009 Nov;99(11):2001-5 - PubMed
    1. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jun;44(6):595-604 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources