Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 Dec;158(6):1297-1304.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.08.037. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

Characteristics and management of patients with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis explantation--the University of Montreal Hospital Center experience

Affiliations
Observational Study

Characteristics and management of patients with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis explantation--the University of Montreal Hospital Center experience

Qianqian Wang et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the characteristics of patients who had Boston keratoprosthesis (KPro) explantation and the outcomes of their subsequent management.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Methods: Cases that underwent Boston type 1 KPro at University of Montreal Hospital Center between October 2008 and May 2012 were reviewed. Patients with KPro explantation were identified and compared to those with KPro retention. Visual acuity, expressed as logMAR, was followed as primary outcome.

Results: A total of 345.1 life-years of device implantation were included in the analysis. Among 110 operated eyes, 11 eyes had KPro explantation, corresponding to a failure rate of 0.03/life-year. KPro was explanted at 19.7 ± 10.5 (4-40) months post KPro. Indications included sterile keratolysis (n = 7), infection (n = 2), and hypotony and painful blind eye (1 each). Compared to patients with KPro retention, those requiring KPro explantation were associated with aniridia (P = .0038), sterile keratolysis (P < .001), retroprosthesis membrane (P = .02), and intraocular inflammation (P = .04). KPro exchange (n = 8), penetrating keratoplasty (n = 1), or evisceration (n = 2) were performed as a secondary intervention. Among patients with KPro explantation, 4 (36.4%) recovered better than baseline visual acuity at final visit. Posterior segment complications (n = 5, 62.5%) were the most common cause of permanent vision loss. Final visual prognosis correlates with pre-explantation visual function (r = 0.68, P = .02).

Conclusions: Boston KPro explantation is a serious complication. Aniridic eyes are at significant risk and have a shortened keratoprosthesis retention time. When managed appropriately, patients can recover significant vision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types