Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;43(2):128-34.
doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12127. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

Dentists' decisions to conduct caries risk assessment in a Dental Practice-Based Research Network

Affiliations

Dentists' decisions to conduct caries risk assessment in a Dental Practice-Based Research Network

Naoki Kakudate et al. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: (i) To quantify the importance that dentists place on caries risk factors when developing a caries treatment plan and (ii) to test the hypothesis that the ratings of importance for specific factors are significantly associated with whether or not the dentist performs caries risk assessment (CRA).

Methods: This study used a cross-sectional study design consisting of a questionnaire survey. The study queried dentists who worked in outpatient dental practices who were affiliated with the Dental Practice-Based Research Network Japan (JDPBRN), which seeks to engage dentists in investigating research questions and sharing experiences and expertise (n = 282). Participants (n = 189) were asked to rate the importance of caries risk factors when developing a caries treatment plan in both adult and pediatric patients.

Results: Oral hygiene status was rated as the most important risk factor when developing a treatment plan in both adult and pediatric patients, whereas the use of fluorides was rated as the least important. Results of multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the odds ratios for the decision to perform CRA in the adult patient for past caries experience and use of fluorides were 2.61 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29-5.29) and 1.85 (95% CI: 1.12-3.04), respectively, whereas that for oral hygiene was 3.84 (95% CI: 1.15-12.79) and use of fluorides 1.79 (95% CI: 1.06-3.03) in the pediatric patient.

Conclusions: These results suggest that enhancing dentists' concept of the importance of current use of fluorides when developing a treatment plan may increase the percentage of dentists who conduct CRA in both adult and pediatric patients (clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT01680848).

Keywords: clinical research; dental caries; dental practice-based research; dentist's practice pattern; evidence-based dentistry; risk assessments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kidd EAM. Essentials of dental caries: the disease and its management. 3. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. pp. 60–5.
    1. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Professionally applied topical fluoride: evidence-based clinical recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:1151–59. - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Policy on use of a caries-risk assessment tool (CAT) for infants, children and adolescents. Reference Manual 2007–2008. Pediatr Dent. 2007;29:29–33. - PubMed
    1. Reich E, Lussi A, Newbrun E. Caries-risk assessment. Int Dent J. 1999;49:15–26. - PubMed
    1. Fontana M, Zero DT. Assessing patients’ caries risk. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:1231–39. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data