Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug 30:15:148.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-148.

Do primary care physicians coordinate ambulatory care for chronic disease patients in Canada?

Affiliations

Do primary care physicians coordinate ambulatory care for chronic disease patients in Canada?

Alan Katz et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Adults with chronic disease are the most frequent users of the primary healthcare system. In Manitoba, patients are allowed to seek ambulatory (outpatient) care from the provider of their choosing (primary care physician or specialist), with referrals to specialists preferred but not always required. Some patients receive their routine care from specialists. We conducted this study to determine the patterns by which adults with chronic disease access ambulatory care as a prelude to exploring the impact these patterns may have on the quality of care received.

Methods: Physician claims for all visits between 2007/8-2009/10 were extracted from the Data Repository at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. Patients included in the analysis made at least four ambulatory visits to a primary care physician or specialist within the study period, and met the definition criteria for at least one of six chronic diseases: diabetes mellitus; congestive heart failure; mood disorders; ischemic heart disease; total respiratory morbidity; and/or hypertension. Patients were "assigned" to the physician they visited most regularly. Physician visit patterns were assessed by dividing visits into nine visit types based on the type of physician patients visited (assigned primary care physician, other primary care physician, or specialist) and whether or not they received a referral.

Results: 347,606 patients with 7,662,411 physician visits were included in the analysis. Most visits were to the patients' assigned primary care physician. About 50% of the visits to specialists were by referral from the assigned primary care physician. However, 26-29% of all visits to a primary care physician were not to the assigned primary care physician, and non-assigned physicians were more likely to refer patients to specialists than assigned primary care physicians.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that the current primary care system in Manitoba may not adequately support coordination of ambulatory care. Ambulatory visits to a primary care provider who is not the patient's regular provider may represent a lost opportunity for coordination and continuity of care, and may affect the quality of care patients receive. Primary care renewal initiatives in this province should address this challenge to service provision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Criteria for developing the study cohort. Physician visit data from chronic disease patients was obtained from the Repository. Patients with one or more chronic disease(s) were included in the study if they met the following inclusion criteria: they were in the Manitoba Health Insurance Registry, were at least 19 years old, had lived in Manitoba during the entire study period, and had made at least 4 ambulatory visits to primary care physicians or specialists during the 3-year study period.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Physician assignment algorithm. Patients in the study cohort were assigned to a physician based on the frequency of their physician visits during the 3-year study period.

References

    1. Freeman GK, Olesen F, Hjortdahl P. Continuity of care: an essential element of modern general practice? Fam Pract. 2003;20(6):623–627. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmg601. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gray DP, Evans P, Sweeney K, Lings P, Seamark D, Seamark C, Dixon M, Bradley N. Towards a theory of continuity of care. J R Soc Med. 2003;96(4):160–166. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.96.4.160. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stokes T, Tarrant C, Mainous AG, 3rd, Schers H, Freeman G, Baker R. Continuity of care: is the personal doctor still important? A survey of general practitioners and family physicians in England and Wales, the United States, and The Netherlands. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(4):353–359. doi: 10.1370/afm.351. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Starfield B. Primary care: an increasingly important contributor to effectiveness, equity, and efficiency of health services. SESPAS report 2012. Gac Sanit. 2012;26(Suppl 1):20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.10.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Soeren M, Hurlock-Chorostecki C, Pogue P, Sanders J. Primary healthcare renewal in Canada: a glass half empty? Healthc Pap. 2008;8(2):39–44. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2008.19707. - DOI - PubMed
Pre-publication history
    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/15/148/prepub

Publication types

MeSH terms