Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Sep 2:40:72.
doi: 10.1186/s13052-014-0072-8.

Pediatric cochlear implantation: an update

Affiliations
Review

Pediatric cochlear implantation: an update

Vincenzo Vincenti et al. Ital J Pediatr. .

Abstract

Deafness in pediatric age can adversely impact language acquisition as well as educational and social-emotional development. Once diagnosed, hearing loss should be rehabilitated early; the goal is to provide the child with maximum access to the acoustic features of speech within a listening range that is safe and comfortable. In presence of severe to profound deafness, benefit from auditory amplification cannot be enough to allow a proper language development. Cochlear implants are partially implantable electronic devices designed to provide profoundly deafened patients with hearing sensitivity within the speech range. Since their introduction more than 30 years ago, cochlear implants have improved their performance to the extent that are now considered to be standard of care in the treatment of children with severe to profound deafness. Over the years patient candidacy has been expanded and the criteria for implantation continue to evolve within the paediatric population. The minimum age for implantation has progressively reduced; it has been recognized that implantation at a very early age (12-18 months) provides children with the best outcomes, taking advantage of sensitive periods of auditory development. Bilateral implantation offers a better sound localization, as well as a superior ability to understand speech in noisy environments than unilateral cochlear implant. Deafened children with special clinical situations, including inner ear malformation, cochlear nerve deficiency, cochlear ossification, and additional disabilities can be successfully treated, even thogh they require an individualized candidacy evaluation and a complex post-implantation rehabilitation. Benefits from cochlear implantation include not only better abilities to hear and to develop speech and language skills, but also improved academic attainment, improved quality of life, and better employment status. Cochlear implants permit deaf people to hear, but they have a long way to go before their performance being comparable to that of the intact human ear; researchers are looking for more sophisticated speech processing strategies as well as a more efficient coupling between the electrodes and the cochlear nerve with the goal of dramatically improving the quality of sound of the next generation of implants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cochlear implant (external part). 1: microphone; 2: speech processor; 3: external antenna; 4: magnet.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cochlear implant (internal part).
Figure 3
Figure 3
How a cochlear implant works. The microphone (1) picks up sound; the speech processor (2) analyzes and transforms sound into digital information; the magnetic headpiece (3) transmits the coded signal to the surgically implanted part (4); the intracochlear electrodes (5) stimulate the cochlear nerve fibers (6).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cochlear implant surgery. a: skin incision; b. mastoidectomy; c: cochlear implant secured in place.

References

    1. Goller Y. Cochlear implantation in children: implications for the primary care provider. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006;18:397–408. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00157.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ramsden JD, Gordon K, Aschendorff A, Borucki L, Bunne M, Burdo S, Garabedian N, Grolman W, Irving R, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Loundon N, Manrique M, Martin J, Raine C, Wouters J, Papsin BC. European bilateral pediatric cochlear implant forum consensus statement. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33:346–350. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182536ae2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Task force on newborn and infant hearing: detection and intervention. Pediatrics. 1999;103:527–530. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.2.527. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Almond M, Brown DJ. The pathology and etiology of sensorineural hearing loss and implications for cochlear implantation. In: Niparko JK, editor. Cochlear implants: principles & practice. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. pp. 43–81.
    1. Orsoni JG, Zavota L, Vincenti V, Pellistri I, Rama P. Cogan syndrome in children: early diagnosis and treatment is critical to prognosis. Am J Ophtalmol. 2004;137:757–758. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.09.034. - DOI - PubMed