Evaluation of electronic cigarette liquids and aerosol for the presence of selected inhalation toxins
- PMID: 25180080
- PMCID: PMC4892705
- DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu176
Evaluation of electronic cigarette liquids and aerosol for the presence of selected inhalation toxins
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate sweet-flavored electronic cigarette (EC) liquids for the presence of diacetyl (DA) and acetyl propionyl (AP), which are chemicals approved for food use but are associated with respiratory disease when inhaled.
Methods: In total, 159 samples were purchased from 36 manufacturers and retailers in 7 countries. Additionally, 3 liquids were prepared by dissolving a concentrated flavor sample of known DA and AP levels at 5%, 10%, and 20% concentration in a mixture of propylene glycol and glycerol. Aerosol produced by an EC was analyzed to determine the concentration of DA and AP.
Results: DA and AP were found in 74.2% of the samples, with more samples containing DA. Similar concentrations were found in liquid and aerosol for both chemicals. The median daily exposure levels were 56 μg/day (IQR: 26-278 μg/day) for DA and 91 μg/day (IQR: 20-432 μg/day) for AP. They were slightly lower than the strict NIOSH-defined safety limits for occupational exposure and 100 and 10 times lower compared with smoking respectively; however, 47.3% of DA and 41.5% of AP-containing samples exposed consumers to levels higher than the safety limits.
Conclusions: DA and AP were found in a large proportion of sweet-flavored EC liquids, with many of them exposing users to higher than safety levels. Their presence in EC liquids represents an avoidable risk. Proper measures should be taken by EC liquid manufacturers and flavoring suppliers to eliminate these hazards from the products without necessarily limiting the availability of sweet flavors.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures



Comment in
-
Comment on Farsalinos et al., "Evaluation of Electronic Cigarette Liquids and Aerosol for the Presence of Selected Inhalation Toxins".Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Oct;17(10):1288-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu338. Epub 2015 Jan 12. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015. PMID: 25586777 No abstract available.
-
Why We Consider the NIOSH-Proposed Safety Limits for Diacetyl and Acetyl Propionyl Appropriate in the Risk Assessment of Electronic Cigarette Liquid Use: A Response to Hubbs et al.Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Oct;17(10):1290-1. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv005. Epub 2015 Jan 12. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015. PMID: 25586778 No abstract available.
References
-
- Regan AK, Promoff G, Dube SR, Arrazola R. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: adult use and awareness of the ‘e-cigarette’ in the USA. Tob Control. 2013;22:19–23. - PubMed
-
- Farsalinos KE, Stimson GV. Is there any legal and scientific basis for classifying electronic cigarettes as medications? [published online ahead of print April 07, 2014]. Int J Drug Policy. 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.03.003. - PubMed
-
- Flavors and Extracts Manufacturers’ Association (FEMA). Safety assessment and regulatory authority to use flavors: focus on e-cigarettes 2014. http://www.femaflavor.org/safety-assessment-and-regulatory-authority-use.... Accessed May 31, 2014.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical