Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014;15(1):54.
doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0054-9. Epub 2014 Sep 2.

Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliances

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliances

Leniana Santos Neves et al. Prog Orthod. 2014.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator, associated with fixed appliances.

Methods: The sample comprised 77 young individuals divided into 3 groups: Group 1 consisted of 25 patients treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance associated with fixed appliances for a mean period of 2.15 years; group 2 had 30 patients, treated with the Bionator and fixed appliances, for a mean treatment time of 3.92 years; and the control group included 22 subjects followed for a mean period of 2.13 years. The initial and final lateral cephalograms of the patients were evaluated. Intergroup comparison at the initial stage and of the treatment changes were performed by analysis of variance.

Results: Their effects consisted in a restrictive effect on the maxilla, a slight increase in anterior face height, retrusion and extrusion of the maxillary incisors, labial tipping and protrusion of the mandibular incisors in both groups and intrusion with the Jasper Jumper appliance, maxillary molar distalization with the Jasper Jumper, extrusion and mesialization of the mandibular molars, both appliances provided significant improvement of the maxillomandibular relationship, overjet, overbite and molar relationship.

Conclusions: The effects of both appliances in class II malocclusion treatment are similar; however, treatment with the Jasper Jumper was shorter than with the Bionator.

Keywords: Activator appliances; Cephalometry; Orthodontic appliance design; Treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Jasper Jumper appliance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bionator appliance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dentoalveolar cephalometric variables: 1, 1.PP; 2, 1-PP; 3, 6-PP; 4, 6-ANSperp; 5, 1.NA; 6, 1-NA; 7, IMPA; 8, 1-GoMe; 9, 1.NB; 10, 1-NB; 11, 6-Pogperp; 12, 6-GoMe.

References

    1. Sassouni V. A classification of skeletal facial types. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:109–23. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(69)90122-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oliveira JN, Jr, Almeida RR, Almeida MR, Oliveira JN. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jakobsone G, Latkauskiene D, McNamara JA., Jr Mechanisms of class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase class II therapy: 1 year follow-up. Prog Orthod. 2013;14:27. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-27. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perillo L, Femiano A, Palumbo S, Contardo L, Perinetti G. Skeletal and dental effects produced by functional regulator-2 in pre-pubertal class II patients: a controlled study. Prog Orthod. 2013;14:18. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-18. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sari Z, Goyenc Y, Doruk C, Usumez S. Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:286–93. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources