Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul 8:6:58.
doi: 10.12703/P6-58. eCollection 2014.

Management of tricuspid regurgitation

Affiliations
Review

Management of tricuspid regurgitation

Michele De Bonis et al. F1000Prime Rep. .

Abstract

Secondary tricuspid regurgitation is the most frequent type of tricuspid insufficiency in western countries. Its surgical treatment is still an object of debate both in terms of timing and surgical techniques. Until recently, the avoidance of surgery for tricuspid repair was commonly accepted in patients with less than severe secondary tricuspid regurgitation undergoing left-sided valve surgery. More recently, compelling evidence in favour of a more aggressive surgical approach in this setting has emerged. The surgical technique should be tailored to the stage of disease. Ring annuloplasty is more durable than suture annuloplasty and represents the method of choice in the presence of isolated annular dilatation. In patients in whom the dilatation of the tricuspid annulus is combined with significant leaflet tethering, annuloplasty alone is unlikely to be durable and additional procedures have been proposed in order to achieve a more durable repair. In this review, pathophysiology, surgical indications, techniques of repair and outcomes of secondary tricuspid regurgitation will be discussed. We will also focus on the challenging issue of significant tricuspid regurgitation occurring late after left-sided valve surgery. Finally, the current and future role of percutaneous tricuspid valve technologies will be briefly described.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cohen SR, Sell JE, McIntosh CL, Clark RE. Tricuspid regurgitation in patients with acquired, chronic, pure mitral regurgitation. I. Prevalence, diagnosis, and comparison of preoperative clinical and hemodynamic features in patients with and without tricuspid regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987;94:481–7. - PubMed
    1. Braunwald NS, Ross J, Morrow AG. Conservative management of tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement. Circulation. 1967;35:I63–9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.35.4S1.I-63. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dreyfus GD, Corbi PJ, Chan K M John, Bahrami T. Secondary tricuspid regurgitation or dilatation: which should be the criteria for surgical repair? Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:127–32. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.057. - DOI - PubMed
    2. http://f1000.com/prime/718452486

    1. Chan V, Burwash IG, Lam B, Auyeung T, Tran A, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Clinical and echocardiographic impact of functional tricuspid regurgitation repair at the time of mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1209–15. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.06.034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee J, Song J, Park JP, Lee JW, Kang D, Song J. Long-term prognosis of isolated significant tricuspid regurgitation. Circ J. 2010;74:375–80. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-09-0679. - DOI - PubMed
    2. http://f1000.com/prime/718452487