Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline
- PMID: 25185096
- PMCID: PMC6076042
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7479
Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline
Abstract
Purpose: To identify optimal chemo- and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)- negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer.
Methods: A systematic review of randomized evidence (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses) from 1993 through to current was completed. Outcomes of interest included survival, progression-free survival, response, quality of life, and adverse effects. Guideline recommendations were evidence based and were agreed on by the Expert Panel via consensus.
Results: Seventy-nine studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 20 systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses, 30 trials on first-line treatment, and 29 trials on second-line and subsequent treatment. These trials form the evidence base for the guideline recommendations.
Recommendations: Endocrine therapy is preferable to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer unless improvement is medically necessary (eg, immediately life-threatening disease). Single agent is preferable to combination chemotherapy, and longer planned duration improves outcome but must be balanced against toxicity. There is no single optimal first-line or subsequent line chemotherapy, and choice of treatment will be determined by multiple factors including prior therapy, toxicity, performance status, comorbid conditions, and patient preference. The role of bevacizumab remains controversial. Other targeted therapies have not so far been shown to enhance chemotherapy outcome in HER2-negative breast cancer.
© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at
Comment in
-
Reply to C. Twelves et Al.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 10;33(11):1301. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.2508. Epub 2015 Mar 2. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25732166 No abstract available.
-
Recognizing the place of trials with treatment of physician's choice as the control arm.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 10;33(11):1300-1. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.3228. Epub 2015 Mar 2. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25732168 No abstract available.
References
-
- Siegel R Ma J Zou Z , etal: Cancer statistics, 2014 CA Cancer J Clin 64: 9– 29,2014. - PubMed
-
- Howlader N Noone A Krapcho M , etal: SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2009 (Vintage 2009 populations) 2011. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; http://seer.cancer.gov/archive/csr/1975_2009_pops09/
-
- Advanced breast cancer: Diagnosis and treatment 90– 332,2009. National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK) Cardiff, United Kingdom: National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK)
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
