Inter-observer agreement for diagnostic classification of esophageal motility disorders defined in high-resolution manometry
- PMID: 25185507
- DOI: 10.1111/dote.12278
Inter-observer agreement for diagnostic classification of esophageal motility disorders defined in high-resolution manometry
Abstract
High-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is a recent development used in the evaluation of esophageal function. Our aim was to assess the inter-observer agreement for diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders using this technology. Practitioners registered on the HRM Working Group website were invited to review and classify (i) 147 individual water swallows and (ii) 40 diagnostic studies comprising 10 swallows using a drop-down menu that followed the Chicago Classification system. Data were presented using a standardized format with pressure contours without a summary of HRM metrics. The sequence of swallows was fixed for each user but randomized between users to avoid sequence bias. Participants were blinded to other entries. (i) Individual swallows were assessed by 18 practitioners (13 institutions). Consensus agreement (≤ 2/18 dissenters) was present for most cases of normal peristalsis and achalasia but not for cases of peristaltic dysmotility. (ii) Diagnostic studies were assessed by 36 practitioners (28 institutions). Overall inter-observer agreement was 'moderate' (kappa 0.51) being 'substantial' (kappa > 0.7) for achalasia type I/II and no lower than 'fair-moderate' (kappa >0.34) for any diagnosis. Overall agreement was somewhat higher among those that had performed >400 studies (n = 9; kappa 0.55) and 'substantial' among experts involved in development of the Chicago Classification system (n = 4; kappa 0.66). This prospective, randomized, and blinded study reports an acceptable level of inter-observer agreement for HRM diagnoses across the full spectrum of esophageal motility disorders for a large group of clinicians working in a range of medical institutions. Suboptimal agreement for diagnosis of peristaltic motility disorders highlights contribution of objective HRM metrics.
Keywords: esophageal motility disorder; high-resolution manometry; inter-observer agreement.
© 2014 International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.
Similar articles
-
Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Esophageal Pressure Topography vs. Conventional Line Tracing.Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul;110(7):967-77; quiz 978. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.159. Epub 2015 Jun 2. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26032151 Free PMC article.
-
Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Chicago Classification in pediatric high-resolution esophageal manometry recordings.Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):269-76. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12488. Epub 2014 Dec 17. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015. PMID: 25521418
-
The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):160-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12477. Epub 2014 Dec 3. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015. PMID: 25469569 Free PMC article.
-
Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Lessons Learned.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017 Aug;19(8):37. doi: 10.1007/s11894-017-0576-7. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28730503 Free PMC article. Review.
-
High-resolution esophageal manometry: interpretation in clinical practice.Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;33(4):301-309. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000369. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28426462 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Esophageal Pressure Topography vs. Conventional Line Tracing.Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul;110(7):967-77; quiz 978. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.159. Epub 2015 Jun 2. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26032151 Free PMC article.
-
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for oesophageal manometry and oesophageal reflux monitoring.Gut. 2019 Oct;68(10):1731-1750. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318115. Epub 2019 Jul 31. Gut. 2019. PMID: 31366456 Free PMC article.
-
A System to Assess the Competency for Interpretation of Esophageal Manometry Identifies Variation in Learning Curves.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov;15(11):1708-1714.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.024. Epub 2016 Jul 27. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 27473627 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Determining the Inter-observer Variability and Diagnostic Accuracy of High-resolution Manometry for Esophageal Motility Disorders.J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Jan 30;24(1):58-69. doi: 10.5056/jnm17064. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018. PMID: 29291608 Free PMC article.
-
Integrated Relaxation Pressure Classification and Probe Positioning Failure Detection in High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry Using Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 30;22(1):253. doi: 10.3390/s22010253. Sensors (Basel). 2021. PMID: 35009794 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources