Motor unit number estimation: a technology and literature review
- PMID: 25186553
- DOI: 10.1002/mus.24442
Motor unit number estimation: a technology and literature review
Abstract
Introduction: Numerous methods for motor unit number estimation (MUNE) have been developed. The objective of this article is to summarize and compare the major methods and the available data regarding their reproducibility, validity, application, refinement, and utility.
Methods: Using specified search criteria, a systematic review of the literature was performed. Reproducibility, normative data, application to specific diseases and conditions, technical refinements, and practicality were compiled into a comprehensive database and analyzed.
Results: The most commonly reported MUNE methods are the incremental, multiple-point stimulation, spike-triggered averaging, and statistical methods. All have established normative data sets and high reproducibility. MUNE provides quantitative assessments of motor neuron loss and has been applied successfully to the study of many clinical conditions, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and normal aging.
Conclusions: MUNE is an important research technique in human subjects, providing important data regarding motor unit populations and motor unit loss over time.
Keywords: aging; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; compound muscle action potential; motor unit; motor unit number estimation.
© 2014 American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine.
Comment in
-
Reply to reflection on MUNE.Muscle Nerve. 2015 Apr;51(4):624. doi: 10.1002/mus.24585. Muscle Nerve. 2015. PMID: 25620429 No abstract available.
-
Reflections on motor unit number estimation.Muscle Nerve. 2015 Apr;51(4):623. doi: 10.1002/mus.24586. Muscle Nerve. 2015. PMID: 25620550 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources