Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 3:7:602.
doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-602.

On methods for determining solvent accessible surface area for proteins in their unfolded state

Affiliations

On methods for determining solvent accessible surface area for proteins in their unfolded state

Shennon Lu et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: There are many different methods for estimating solvent accessible surface area for proteins in their unfolded states. In this article, we compare eight methods, assessing whether or not they lead to different estimates of total accessible surface area as well as their impact on relationships with thermodynamic variables.

Findings: Our results demonstrate that most pairs of compared methods do result in different unfolded estimates of accessible surface area (only four pairs of methods do not yield significantly different estimates). However, we do not see a significant impact on the relationship between accessible surface area and thermodynamic parameters across the different methods.

Conclusions: We advocate the use of the Gong and Rose transition midpoint method for computing solvent accessible surface area due to its computational ease, physical basis, and performance in terms of relationships with thermodynamic parameters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Boxplots of unfolded solvent accessible surface area. Unfolded ASA values are provided for comparison across methods for the set of 51 proteins.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boxplots of change in solvent accessible surface area. Changes in ASA values are provided for comparison across methods including tripeptide results for the subset of 44 proteins.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee B, Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol. 1971;55(3):379–IN4. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF Chimera – a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004;25(13):1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zielenkiewicz P, Saenger W. Residue solvent accessibilities in the unfolded polypeptide chain. Biophys J. 1992;63(6):1483–1486. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81746-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spolar RS, Livingstone JR, Record MT., Jr Use of liquid hydrocarbon and amide transfer data to estimate contributions to thermodynamic functions of protein folding from the removal of nonpolar and polar surface from water. Biochemistry. 1992;31(16):3947–3955. doi: 10.1021/bi00131a009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Creamer TP, Srinivasan R, Rose GD. Modeling unfolded states of peptides and proteins. Biochemistry. 1995;34(50):16245–16250. doi: 10.1021/bi00050a003. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources