Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug;8(4):405-11.
doi: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.4.405. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

End plate disproportion and degenerative disc disease: a case-control study

Affiliations

End plate disproportion and degenerative disc disease: a case-control study

Masoud Poureisa et al. Asian Spine J. 2014 Aug.

Abstract

Study design: Case-control.

Purpose: To determine whether a disproportion between two neighboring vertebral end plates is associated with degenerative disc disease.

Overview of literature: Recently, it has been suggested that disproportion of the end plates of two adjacent vertebrae may increase the risk of disc herniation.

Methods: Magnetic resonance (MR) images (n=160) with evidence of grades I-II lumbar degenerative disc disease (modified Pfirrmann's classification) and normal MR images of the lumbar region (n=160) were reviewed. On midsagittal sections, the difference of anteroposterior diameter of upper and lower end plates neighboring a degenerated (in the case group) or normal (in the control group) intervertebral disc was calculated (difference of end plates [DEP]).

Results: Mean DEP was significantly higher in the case group at the L5-S1 level (2.73±0.23 mm vs. 2.21±0.12 mm, p=0.03). Differences were not statistically significant at L1-L2 (1.31±0.13 mm in the cases vs. 1.28±0.08 mm in the controls, p=0.78), L2-L3 (1.45±0.12 mm in the cases vs. 1.37±0.08 mm in the controls, p=0.58), L3-L4 (1.52±0.13 mm in the cases vs. 1.49±0.10 mm in the controls, p=0.88), and L4-L5 (2.15±0.21 mm in the cases vs. 2.04±0.20 mm in the controls, p=0.31) levels. The difference at the L5-S1 level did not remain significant after adjusting for body mass index (BMI), which was significantly higher in the patients.

Conclusions: End plate disproportion may be a significant, BMI-dependent risk factor for lumbar degenerative disc disease.

Keywords: Anatomy; Intervertebral disc degeneration; Vertebra.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A sagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance image reconstruction with measurements on the third and forth lumbar vertebrae in a normal subject.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fardon DF, Milette PC Combined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology: recommendations of the Combined task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:E93–E113. - PubMed
    1. Modic MT, Ross JS. Lumbar degenerative disk disease. Radiology. 2007;245:43–61. - PubMed
    1. Buckwalter JA, Saltzman C, Brown T. The impact of osteoarthritis: implications for research. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(427 Suppl):S6–S15. - PubMed
    1. de Schepper EI, Damen J, van Meurs JB, et al. The association between lumbar disc degeneration and low back pain: the influence of age, gender, and individual radiographic features. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:531–536. - PubMed
    1. Goode AP, Marshall SW, Renner JB, et al. Lumbar spine radiographic features and demographic, clinical, and radiographic knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:1536–1544. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources