Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Nov;37(4):583-96.
doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

Preterm infants' orally directed behaviors and behavioral state responses to the integrated H-HOPE intervention

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Preterm infants' orally directed behaviors and behavioral state responses to the integrated H-HOPE intervention

Rosemary White-Traut et al. Infant Behav Dev. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Preterm infants are challenged by immature infant behavioral organization which may negatively influence their ability to oral feed. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the integrated H-HOPE (Hospital to Home: Optimizing the Infant's Environment) intervention would improve infant behavioral organization by increasing the frequency of orally directed behaviors and the proportion of time spent in an alert behavioral state when offered prior to oral feeding. Mother-infant dyads (n=198) were randomly assigned to the H-HOPE intervention or the Attention Control groups. Infants were born at 29-34 weeks gestation and were clinically stable. Mothers had at least two social environmental risk factors such as minority status or less than high school education. H-HOPE is an integrated intervention that included (1) twice-daily infant directed stimulation using the ATVV intervention (auditory, tactile, visual, and vestibular stimuli) and (2) maternal participatory guidance sessions by a nurse-community advocate team. Orally directed behaviors and behavioral states were assessed weekly prior to feeding during hospitalization when infants were able to feed orally. There were no differences between the groups at baseline (Day 0, prior to the initiation of the integrated H-HOPE intervention). We observed a pattern of increased frequency of orally directed behaviors in the H-HOPE intervention group when compared to the Attention Control group, however, the proportion of time spent in an alert behavioral state remained stable in both groups over the course of the study. On Day 7, the H-HOPE intervention group exhibited a significantly higher mean frequency of orally directed behaviors than the Attention Control group (12.6 vs. 7.1 pre-intervention, 51.8 vs. 33.2 during intervention, 4.3 vs. 3.2 immediately after intervention, and 8.9 vs. 5.3 immediately prior to feeding). On Day 7, the H-HOPE intervention group exhibited a significantly higher proportion of time spent in an alert behavioral state only during intervention (0.26 vs. 0.11) and immediately after intervention (0.28 vs. 0.06). These findings are suggestive that the integrated H-HOPE intervention facilitated infant behavioral organization for clinically stable infants born between 29 and 34 weeks gestation. The orally directed behaviors appear to be an important indicator of the infant's preparation for feeding, and when used in conjunction with assessment of behavioral states, are especially valuable to the clinician. Use of this combined assessment approach in practice would strengthen clinician assessment for initiation of (beginning the first oral feeding) and daily preparation for oral feeding in preterm infants.

Keywords: Behavioral states; Multisensory intervention; Orally directed behaviors; Preterm infants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Enrollment, Randomization, and Final Sample Size
Figure 2
Figure 2
Timeline for Data Collection and Analysis
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean Frequency of Total Orally Directed Behaviors Pre-Intervention
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean Frequency of Orally Directed Behaviors During Intervention
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean Frequency of Orally Directed Behaviors Immediately After Intervention
Figure 6
Figure 6
Mean Frequency of Orally Directed Behaviors Immediately Prior to Feeding
Figure 7
Figure 7
Mean Proportion of Time Spent in an Alert Behavioral State Immediately After Intervention

References

    1. Ardura J, Andres J, Aldana J, Revilla MA. Development of sleep-wakefulness rhythm in premature babies. Acta Pædiatrica. 1995;84(5):484–489. - PubMed
    1. Bell AF, Lucas R, White-Traut RC. Concept clarification of neonatal neurobehavioural organization. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008;61(5):570–581. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell AF, White-Traut R, Rankin K. Fetal exposure to synthetic oxytocin and the relationship with prefeeding cues within one hour postbirth. Early Human Development. 2012;89(3):137–143. - PubMed
    1. Bingham PM, Ashikaga T, Abbasi S. Relationship of behavioral state and tube-feeding to non-nutritive sucking in premature infants. Journal of Neonatal Nursing. 2011;17:150–157.
    1. Brazelton TB, Nugent JK. Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale. Vol. 3. London: Mac Keith Press; 1995.

Publication types