Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 5:15:66.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-66.

The social value of clinical research

Affiliations

The social value of clinical research

Michelle G J L Habets et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: International documents on ethical conduct in clinical research have in common the principle that potential harms to research participants must be proportional to anticipated benefits. The anticipated benefits that can justify human research consist of direct benefits to the research participant, and societal benefits, also called social value. In first-in-human research, no direct benefits are expected and the benefit component of the risks-benefit assessment thus merely exists in social value. The concept social value is ambiguous by nature and is used in numerous ways in the research ethics literature. Because social value justifies involving human participants, especially in early human trials, this is problematic.

Discussion: Our analysis and interpretation of the concept social value has led to three proposals. First, as no direct benefits are expected for the research participants in first-in-human trials, we believe it is better to discuss a risk- value assessment instead of a risk - benefit assessment. This will also make explicit the necessity to have a clear and common use for the concept social value. Second, to avoid confusion we propose to limit the concept social value to the intervention tested. It is the expected improvement the intervention can bring to the wellbeing of (future) patients or society that is referred to when we speak about social value. For the sole purpose of gaining knowledge, we should not expose humans to potential harm; the ultimate justification of involving humans in research lies in the anticipated social value of the intervention. Third, at the moment only the validity of the clinical research proposal is a prerequisite for research to take place. We recommend making the anticipated social value a prerequisite as well.

Summary: In this paper we analyze the use of the concept social value in research ethics. Despite its unavoidable ambiguity, we aim to find a best use of the concept, subject to its role in justifying involving humans in first-in-human research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Freedman B. Scientific value and validity as ethical requirements for research: a proposed explication. IRB. 1987;9:7–10. doi: 10.2307/3563623. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karlawish JHT. Clinical value: the neglected axis in the system of research ethics. Account Res. 2013;7:255–264. - PubMed
    1. King NM. Defining and describing benefit appropriately in clinical trials. J Law Med Ethics. 2000;28:332–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2000.tb00685.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Casarett DJ, Karlawish JH, Moreno v. A taxonomy of value in clinical research. IRB. 2002;24:1–6. - PubMed
    1. Kimmelman J. Gene Transfer and the Ethics of First-in-Human Experiments: Lost in Translation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources