Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;28(12):1425-30.
doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.210. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

The role of orbital ultrasonography in distinguishing papilledema from pseudopapilledema

Affiliations

The role of orbital ultrasonography in distinguishing papilledema from pseudopapilledema

S B Carter et al. Eye (Lond). 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of orbital ultrasonography in distinguishing papilledema from pseudopapilledema in adult patients.

Methods: The records of all adult patients referred to the neuro-ophthalmology service who underwent orbital ultrasonography for the evaluation of suspected papilledema were reviewed. The details of history, ophthalmologic examination, and results of ancillary testing including orbital ultrasonography, MRI, and lumbar puncture were recorded. Results of orbital ultrasonography were correlated with the final diagnosis of papilledema or pseudopapilledema on the basis of the clinical impression of the neuro-ophthalmologist. Ultrasound was considered positive when the optic nerve sheath diameter was ≥3.3 mm along with a positive 30° test.

Results: The sensitivity of orbital ultrasonography for detection of papilledema was 90% (CI: 80.2-99.3%) and the specificity in detecting pseudopapilledema was 79% (CI: 67.7-90.7%).

Conclusions: Orbital ultrasonography is a rapid and noninvasive test that is highly sensitive, but less specific in differentiating papilledema from pseudopapilledema in adult patients, and can be useful in guiding further management of patients in whom the diagnosis is initially uncertain.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Savino PJ, Glaser JS. Pseudopapilledema versus papilledema. Int Ophthal Clin. 1977;17:115–137. - PubMed
    1. Hoyt WF, Pont ME. Pseudopapilledema: anomalous elevation of optic disk: pitfalls in diagnosis and management. JAMA. 1962;181:191–196. - PubMed
    1. Agid R, Farb RI, Willinsky RA, Mikulis DJ, Tomlinson G. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the validity of cross-sectional neuroimaging signs. Neuroradiology. 2006;48:521–527. - PubMed
    1. Atta HR. Imaging of the optic nerve with standardised echography. Eye (Lond) 1988;2:358–366. - PubMed
    1. Biousse V, Bruce BB, Newman NJ. Update on the pathophysiology and management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83:488–494. - PMC - PubMed

Supplementary concepts