Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;19(1):75-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Sep 2.

Development and preliminary testing of head and neck cancer related external lymphedema and fibrosis assessment criteria

Affiliations

Development and preliminary testing of head and neck cancer related external lymphedema and fibrosis assessment criteria

Jie Deng et al. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To develop assessment criteria for evaluating and documenting status of external lymphedema and fibrosis in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).

Methods: This was a two-phase instrument development study. In Phase I, initial assessment criteria for head and neck external lymphedema and fibrosis were generated based on a conceptual framework developed to describe the continuum of lymphedema - fibrosis in HNC patients. The initial Head and Neck External Lymphedema and Fibrosis (HN-ELAF) Assessment Criteria with three components were revised based on expert feedback. In Phase II, a pilot study was conducted to evaluate the revised assessment criteria through direct physical examination of 30 HNC patients with facial swelling and/or scar-like tissue >3 months post-treatment. The following statistical methods were used to evaluate interrater reliability in Phase II: simple percent agreement, the Kappa statistic, and the concordance correlation coefficient. Then, a post-test revision was made to further modify the tool based on the results of the pilot test.

Results: In Phase I, the initial HN-ELAF was revised including deleting Grade 0 (subclinical disease) and two components (i.e., symptoms and functional impairments). The revised HN-ELAF Assessment Criteria demonstrated good content/face validity. In Phase II, the assessment criteria had an acceptable interrater reliability, e.g., 83% exact agreement on grading lymphedema and fibrosis severity; and kappa = 0.75 (p < .001). The assessment criteria were further modified including three dimensions: type, severity, and anatomical sites of lymphedema and fibrosis.

Conclusions: Validation of the modified HN-ELAF Assessment Criteria in larger sample sizes is ongoing.

Keywords: Assessment criteria; Fibrosis; Head and neck cancer; Instrument development; Lymphedema.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types