Prospective randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block within and distal to the adductor canal with low volume of local anesthetic
- PMID: 25190947
- PMCID: PMC4152679
- DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.137271
Prospective randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block within and distal to the adductor canal with low volume of local anesthetic
Abstract
Background and aims: The anatomic site and the volume of local anesthetic needed for an ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block differ in the literature. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of two different ultrasound-guided low volume injections of local anesthetic on saphenous and vastus medialis nerves.
Materials and methods: Recruited patients (N = 48) scheduled for orthopedic surgery were randomized in two groups; Group distal adductor canal (DAC): Ultrasound-guided injection (5 ml of local anesthetic) distal to the inferior foramina of the adductor canal. Group adductor canal (AC): Ultrasound-guided injection (5 ml local anesthetic) within the adductor canal. Following the injection of local anesthetic, block progression was monitored in 5 min intervals for 15 min in the sartorial branches of the saphenous nerve and vastus medialis nerve.
Results: Twenty two patients in each group completed the study. Complete block of the saphenous nerve was observed in 55% and 59% in Group AC and DAC, respectively (P = 0.88). The proportion of patients with vastus medialis weakness at 15 min in Group AC, 36%, was significantly higher than in Group DAC (0/22), (P = 0.021).
Conclusions: Low volume of local anesthetic injected within the adductor canal or distally its inferior foramina leads to moderate success rate of the saphenous nerve block, while only the injection within the adductor canal may result in vastus medialis nerve motor block.
Keywords: saphenous nerve block; sonographic; vastus medialis.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Saphenous Nerve Block From Within the Knee Is Feasible for TKA: MRI and Cadaveric Study.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):30-36. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000006. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018. PMID: 29529612 Free PMC article.
-
Anatomy and clinical implications of the ultrasound-guided subsartorial saphenous nerve block.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;36(4):399-402. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318220f172. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011. PMID: 21697687
-
Evaluation of the proximal adductor canal block injectate spread: a cadaveric study.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Dec 25:rapm-2019-101091. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101091. Online ahead of print. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019. PMID: 31879373
-
Anatomical basis for ultrasound-guided infiltration of the saphenous nerve in the subsartorial canal.J Ultrasound. 2022 Sep;25(3):429-434. doi: 10.1007/s40477-021-00604-9. Epub 2021 Jul 1. J Ultrasound. 2022. PMID: 34195927 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pro and Con: How Important Is the Exact Location of Adductor Canal and Femoral Triangle Blocks?Anesth Analg. 2023 Mar 1;136(3):458-469. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006234. Epub 2023 Feb 17. Anesth Analg. 2023. PMID: 36806233 Review.
Cited by
-
A direct saphenous nerve block in TKA: A surgeon friendly technique! Cadaveric study.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Apr 24;52:102424. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102424. eCollection 2024 May. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024. PMID: 38766386 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound-guided Saphenous Nerve Block for Saphenous Neuralgia after Knee Surgery: Two Case Reports and Review of Literature.Indian J Orthop. 2019 Jan-Feb;53(1):208-212. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_520_17. Indian J Orthop. 2019. PMID: 30906004 Free PMC article.
-
Isokinetic Strength Deficit 6 Months After Adductor Canal Blockade for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Nov 8;5(11):2325967117736249. doi: 10.1177/2325967117736249. eCollection 2017 Nov. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 29152521 Free PMC article.
-
Saphenous Nerve Block From Within the Knee Is Feasible for TKA: MRI and Cadaveric Study.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):30-36. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000006. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018. PMID: 29529612 Free PMC article.
-
Femoral nerve versus adductor canal block for early postoperative pain control and knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autografts: a prospective single-blind randomised controlled trial.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Nov;141(11):1927-1934. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03823-1. Epub 2021 Feb 20. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021. PMID: 33609182 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Benzon HT, Sharma S, Calimaran A. Comparison of the different approaches to saphenous nerve block. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:633–8. - PubMed
-
- van der Wal M, Lang SA, Yip RW. Transsartorial approach for saphenous nerve block. Can J Anaesth. 1993;40:542–6. - PubMed
-
- De Mey JC, Deruyck LJ, Cammu G, De Baerdemaeker LE, Mortier EP. A paravenous approach for the saphenous nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26:504–6. - PubMed
-
- Andersen HL, Gyrn J, Møller L, Christensen B, Zaric D. Continuous saphenous nerve block as supplement to single-dose local infiltration analgesia for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:106–11. - PubMed
-
- Kent ML, Hackworth RJ, Riffenburgh RH, Kaesberg JL, Asseff DC, Lujan E, et al. A comparison of ultrasound-guided and landmark-based approaches to saphenous nerve blockade: A prospective, controlled, blinded, crossover trial. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:265–70. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources