Obstetric outcomes of monochorionic pregnancies conceived following assisted reproductive technology: A retrospective study
- PMID: 25191025
- PMCID: PMC4150138
- DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.138870
Obstetric outcomes of monochorionic pregnancies conceived following assisted reproductive technology: A retrospective study
Abstract
Objectives: The overwhelming numbers of twins following assisted reproductive technology (ART) are dichorionic twins, but monochorionic twins account for around 0.9% of post ART pregnancies. The data for post ART-monochorionic pregnancy outcomes are scarce due to the rarity of this condition. Hence, we evaluated the obstetric outcomes of monochorionic and dichorionic pregnancies conceived on ART.
Settings: University teaching hospital.
Study design: A case-control study of monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) and dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) pregnancies conceived following ART treatment. Charts of all women who conceived following ART from 2008 to 2013 were screened. Among them, the monochorionic twins diagnosed in the first trimester were included and their obstetric outcome was followed-up. For comparison, an equal number of dichorionic twin pregnancies from age and body mass index matched mothers was selected.
Results: The baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. MCDA group had a higher miscarriage rate (50%) than the DCDA group (10%), with three seconds trimester miscarriages in the MCDA group. The live birth rates were lower in the MCDA versus DCDA group (40% vs. 90%). Among triplet pregnancies with a monochorionic component, the live birth rate was only 25%.
Conclusions: Monochorionic pregnancies following ART have poorer obstetric outcomes when compared to dichorionic pregnancies. For monochorionic pregnancies following ART, intensive antenatal surveillance at a tertiary level obstetric and neonatal center may help optimize the outcome.
Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology; monochorionic twins; obstetric outcome.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford S, Anderson JE, Folger SG, Jamieson DJ, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance – United States, 2010. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013;62:1–24. - PubMed
-
- Rossi AC, D’Addario V. Neonatal outcomes of assisted and naturally conceived twins: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Perinat Med. 2011;39:489–93. - PubMed
-
- Derom C, Thiery E, Peeters H, Vlietinck R, Defoort P, Frijns JP. The East Flanders Prospective Twin Survey (EFPTS): An actual perception. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013;16:58–63. - PubMed
-
- Vitthala S, Gelbaya TA, Brison DR, Fitzgerald CT, Nardo LG. The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15:45–55. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources