Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;20(2):59-63.
doi: 10.4103/1117-6806.137288.

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study of the Influence of Primary Closure or Dressing on Post-operative Morbidity after Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

Affiliations

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study of the Influence of Primary Closure or Dressing on Post-operative Morbidity after Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

Peter E Egbor et al. Niger J Surg. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the following study is to determine the effect of primary closure or dressing on post-operative morbidity after impacted lower third molar surgery.

Materials and methods: This was a randomized clinical study of 72 patients who had surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. The subjects were divided into two groups of A and B. Group A had total closure (primary closure) and Group B had whitehead varnish dressing of the socket. Pain, swelling and trismus were evaluated pre-operatively using visual analogue scale, flexible tape measuring method and inter-incisal distance measurement with Vernier Callipers respectively as well as post-operatively on 1(st), 2(nd), 3(rd), 5(th) and 7(th) day.

Results: The study participants consisted of 27 males and 45 females in a ratio 1:1.7. With a mean age of 24.7 ± 4.9 years (range 19-33 years) for Group A and 25.5 ± 4.3 years (range 20-39 years) for Group B. Post-operative pain was not significantly affected by the closure techniques (P > 0.05). Dressing was found to significantly reduce the degree of swelling and trismus peaking on the 2(nd) day (P = 0.0207 and P = 0.010 respectively).

Conclusion: The use of dressing was more effective than primary closure to reduce the degree of swelling and trismus though its effect on post-operative pain reduction was not significant.

Keywords: Dressing; primary closure; randomized; surgery; third molars.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Measurement of facial width. T - tragus, C - commisure, P - pogonium
Figure 2
Figure 2
Post-operative pain according to time-point and technique employed
Figure 3
Figure 3
Post-operative swelling according to time-point and technique used

References

    1. Worrall SF, Riden K, Haskell R, Corrigan AM. UK National third molar project: The initial report. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;36:14–8. - PubMed
    1. Akota I, Alvsaker B, Bjørnland T. The effect of locally applied gauze drain impregnated with chlortetracycline ointment in mandibular third-molar surgery. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998;56:25–9. - PubMed
    1. Saheeb BD, Obuekwe ON. An audit of mandibular third molar surgery. Niger J Surg Res. 2001;3:66–74.
    1. Oginni FO, Ugboko VI, Assam E, Ogunbodede EO. Postoperative complaints following impacted mandibular third molar surgery in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. SADJ. 2002;57:264–8. - PubMed
    1. Brickley MR, Shepherd JP. An investigation of the rationality of lower third molar removal, based on USA National Institutes of Health criteria. Br Dent J. 1996;180:249–54. - PubMed