Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug 20:5:924.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00924. eCollection 2014.

Integrating pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical/psychological knowledge in mathematics

Affiliations

Integrating pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical/psychological knowledge in mathematics

Nora Harr et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

In teacher education at universities, general pedagogical and psychological principles are often treated separately from subject matter knowledge and therefore run the risk of not being applied in the teaching subject. In an experimental study (N = 60 mathematics student teachers) we investigated the effects of providing aspects of general pedagogical/psychological knowledge (PPK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in an integrated or separated way. In both conditions ("integrated" vs. "separated"), participants individually worked on computer-based learning environments addressing the same topic: use and handling of multiple external representations, a central issue in mathematics. We experimentally varied whether PPK aspects and PCK aspects were treated integrated or apart from one another. As expected, the integrated condition led to greater application of pedagogical/psychological aspects and an increase in applying both knowledge types simultaneously compared to the separated condition. Overall, our findings indicate beneficial effects of an integrated design in teacher education.

Keywords: general pedagogical/psychological knowledge; higher education; instructional design; pedagogical content knowledge; teacher education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Translated screenshot of a mathematics classroom scenario. Student teachers completed this task individually. They were asked to combined different elements in accordance with the principles learned in the preceding learning environment(s).

References

    1. Ainsworth S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Comput. Educ. 33 131–152 10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9 - DOI
    1. Ainsworth S. (2006). DeFT: a conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learn. Instr. 16 183–198 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001 - DOI
    1. Ainsworth S., Bibby P., Wood D. (2002). Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. J. Learn. Sci. 11 25–61 10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_2 - DOI
    1. Anderson J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 22 261–295 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3 - DOI
    1. Ayres P. (2013). Can the isolated-elements strategy be improved by targeting points of high cognitive load for additional practice? Learn. Instr. 23 115–124 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.002 - DOI