Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and motor recovery after stroke
- PMID: 25193774
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.08.003
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and motor recovery after stroke
Abstract
Recovery of motor function after stroke occurs largely on the basis of a sustained capacity of the adult brain for plastic changes. This brain plasticity has been validated by functional imaging and electrophysiological studies. Various concepts of how to enhance beneficial plasticity and in turn improve functional recovery are emerging based on the concept of functional interhemispheric balance between the two motor cortices. Besides conventional rehabilitation interventions and the most recent neuropharmacological approaches, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has recently been proposed as an add-on method to promote motor function recovery after stroke. Several methods can be used based either on transcranial magnetic stimulation (repetitive mode: rTMS, TBS) via a coil, or small electric current via larges electrodes placed on the scalp, (transcranial direct current stimulation tDCS). Depending on the different electrophysiological parameters of stimulation used, NIBS can induce a transient modulation of the excitability of the stimulated motor cortex (facilitation or inhibition) via a probable LTP-LTD-like mechanism. Several small studies have shown feasible and positive treatment effects for most of these strategies and their potential clinical relevance to help restoring the disruption of interhemispheric imbalance after stroke. Results of these studies are encouraging but many questions remain unsolved: what are the optimal stimulation parameters? What is the best NIBS intervention? Which cortex, injured or intact, should be stimulated? What is the best window of intervention? Is there a special subgroup of stroke patients who could strongly benefit from these interventions? Finally is it possible to boost NIBS treatment effect by motor training of the paretic hand or by additional neuropharmacological interventions? There is clearly a need for large-scale, controlled, multicenter trials to answer these questions before proposing their routine use in the management of stroke patients.
Keywords: AVC; Brain plasticity; Motor recovery; PAS; Plasticité cérébrale; Récupération motrice; Stroke; TBS; rTMS; tDCS.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
Similar articles
-
Noninvasive Neuromodulation in Poststroke Gait Disorders: Rationale, Feasibility, and State of the Art.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Jan;30(1):71-82. doi: 10.1177/1545968315586464. Epub 2015 May 12. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016. PMID: 25967759 Review.
-
The effects of combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function in patients with stroke.Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016 Nov 22;34(6):915-923. doi: 10.3233/RNN-160654. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27689549 Clinical Trial.
-
Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation to Enhance Post-Stroke Recovery.Front Neural Circuits. 2016 Jul 27;10:56. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2016.00056. eCollection 2016. Front Neural Circuits. 2016. PMID: 27512367 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation in motor rehabilitation after stroke: an update.Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Sep;58(4):220-224. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 Aug 10. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015. PMID: 26272418 Review.
-
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation to Enhance Functional Recovery After Stroke: Studies in Animal Models.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018 Nov;32(11):927-940. doi: 10.1177/1545968318804425. Epub 2018 Oct 24. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018. PMID: 30352528 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
[Comparative analysis of the impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and burst transcranial magnetic stimulation at different frequencies on memory function and neuronal excitability of mice].Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Oct 25;41(5):935-944. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.202312017. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2024. PMID: 39462661 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Effects of mirror therapy combined with theta burst stimulation on motor recovery of upper limbs after stroke: a randomized controlled study.Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 11;16:1548703. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1548703. eCollection 2025. Front Neurol. 2025. PMID: 40718097 Free PMC article.
-
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Rehabilitation Therapy for Upper Limb Hemiparesis in Stroke Patients: A Narrative Review.Prog Rehabil Med. 2023 Mar 1;8:20230005. doi: 10.2490/prm.20230005. eCollection 2023. Prog Rehabil Med. 2023. PMID: 36866154 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 20;13:918597. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.918597. eCollection 2022. Front Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35795793 Free PMC article.
-
A study of dynamic hand orthosis combined with unilateral task-oriented training in subacute stroke: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy case series.Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 11;13:907186. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.907186. eCollection 2022. Front Neurol. 2022. PMID: 36034313 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical