Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;129(3):505-10.
doi: 10.1007/s00414-014-1073-2. Epub 2014 Sep 7.

Development of a skull/brain model for military wound ballistics studies

Affiliations

Development of a skull/brain model for military wound ballistics studies

Debra Carr et al. Int J Legal Med. 2015 May.

Abstract

Reports on penetrating ballistic head injuries in the literature are dominated by case studies of suicides; the penetrating ammunition usually being .22 rimfire or shotgun. The dominating cause of injuries in modern warfare is fragmentation and hence, this is the primary threat that military helmets protect the brain from. When helmets are perforated, this is usually by bullets. In combat, 20% of penetrating injuries occur to the head and its wounding accounts for 50% of combat deaths. A number of head simulants are described in the academic literature, in ballistic test methods for helmets (including measurement of behind helmet blunt trauma, BHBT) and in the 'open' and 'closed' government literature of several nations. The majority of these models are not anatomically correct and are not assessed with high-velocity rifle ammunition. In this article, an anatomically correct 'skull' (manufactured from polyurethane) and 'brain' (manufactured from 10%, by mass, gelatine) model for use in military wound ballistic studies is described. Filling the cranium completely with gelatine resulted in a similar 'skull' fracture pattern as an anatomically correct 'brain' combined with a representation of cerebrospinal fluid. In particular, posterior cranial fossa and occipital fractures and brain ejection were observed. This pattern of injury compared favourably to reported case studies of actual incidents in the literature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Sports Med. 2002 Oct;36(5):314 - PubMed
    1. Int J Legal Med. 1991;104(4):235-8 - PubMed
    1. Forensic Sci Int. 2004 May 10;141(2-3):91-8 - PubMed
    1. Inj Prev. 2002 Dec;8(4):324-7 - PubMed
    1. Forensic Sci Int. 1997 May 5;86(3):155-61 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources