Obstetrician volume as a potentially modifiable risk factor for cesarean delivery
- PMID: 25198280
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000473
Obstetrician volume as a potentially modifiable risk factor for cesarean delivery
Abstract
Objective: To examine the relationship between an obstetrician's delivery volume and a patient's risk for cesarean delivery.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined patient-level and obstetrician-level data between 2000 and 2012 at a large academic hospital. All laboring patients who delivered viable, liveborn, singleton newborns (N=58,328) were included. We measured the association of delivery volume and cesarean delivery using a multivariate logistic regression. We also assessed the association of volume by calculating adjusted cesarean delivery rates using the least squares means method. These analyses were performed on the subset of nulliparous patients with term, singleton, vertex-presenting fetuses. In addition, the association of obstetrician experience was compared against delivery volume.
Results: There was a twofold increase in the odds of cesarean delivery for patients whose obstetricians performed fewer than the median (60) number of deliveries per year (quartile 1: odds ratio 2.00, 95% confidence interval 1.68-2.38; quartile 2: odds ratio 2.73, 95% CI 2.40-3.11) as compared with quartile 4. The adjusted cesarean delivery rate decreased from 18.2% to 9.2% from the highest to lowest volume quartile (P<.001). Compared with the volume effects, an obstetrician's experience had a smaller effect on a patient's risk of cesarean delivery.
Conclusion: Patients delivered by obstetricians with low delivery volume are at significantly increased risk for cesarean delivery after controlling for patient and obstetrician characteristics. In contrast, obstetrician experience had a less significant effect. These findings may prompt discussions regarding the role of volume in credentialing and practice models that direct patients to obstetricians with high delivery volume.
Level of evidence: : II.
Similar articles
-
Impact of surgeon annual volume on short-term maternal outcome in cesarean delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1):85.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.028. Epub 2016 Mar 19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27005515
-
The relationship between obstetricians' cognitive and affective traits and their patients' delivery outcomes.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;211(6):692.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jun 4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24907699
-
A new index for obstetrics safety and quality of care: integrating cesarean delivery rates with maternal and neonatal outcomes.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;226(4):556.e1-556.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Oct 8. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 34634261 Review.
-
Singleton, Term, Vertex Cesarean Delivery on a Midwife Service Compared With an Obstetrician Service.Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;135(6):1353-1361. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003748. Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32459427
-
Cesarean Delivery and Gender of Delivering Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;136(6):1170-1178. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004172. Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 33156182
Cited by
-
Staff Resources in Public and Private Hospitals and Their Implication for Medical Practice: A French Study of Caesareans.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 14;12(10):1007. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101007. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38786416 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the influence of medical staffing and birth volume on observed-to-expected cesarean deliveries: a panel data analysis of integrated obstetric and gynecological departments in Germany.Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Aug;26(6):987-1022. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01749-0. Epub 2025 Jan 21. Eur J Health Econ. 2025. PMID: 39836312 Free PMC article.
-
Caesarean Section Rates and Activity-Based Funding in Northern Norway: A Model-Based Study Using the World Health Organization's Recommendation.Obstet Gynecol Int. 2018 Jul 16;2018:6764258. doi: 10.1155/2018/6764258. eCollection 2018. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2018. PMID: 30116268 Free PMC article.
-
The causal effect of delivery volume on severe maternal morbidity: an instrumental variable analysis in Sichuan, China.BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5):e008428. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008428. BMJ Glob Health. 2022. PMID: 35537760 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with cesarean delivery rates: a single-institution experience.Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2017 Apr 21;3:8. doi: 10.1186/s40748-017-0047-z. eCollection 2017. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2017. PMID: 28439421 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Liu S, Heaman M, Joseph KS, Liston RM, Huang L, Sauve R, et al.. Risk of maternal postpartum readmission associated with mode of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:836–42.
-
- Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Can Med Assoc J 2007;176:455–60.
-
- Janakiraman V, Ecker J. Quality in obstetric care: measuring what matters. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:728–32.
-
- Main EK, Moore D, Farrell B, Schimmel LD, Altman RJ, Abrahams C, et al.. Is there a useful cesarean birth measure? Assessment of the nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean birth rate as a tool for obstetric quality improvement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:1644–51.
-
- Srinivas SK, Fager C, Lorch SA. Evaluating risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rate as a measure of obstetric quality. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:1007–13.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials