Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 8;4(9):e006021.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006021.

Patients' online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review

Simon de Lusignan  1 , Freda Mold  1 , Aziz Sheikh  2 , Azeem Majeed  3 , Jeremy C Wyatt  4 , Tom Quinn  5 , Mary Cavill  6 , Toto Anne Gronlund  7 , Christina Franco  8 , Umesh Chauhan  9 , Hannah Blakey  10 , Neha Kataria  1 , Fiona Barker  1 , Beverley Ellis  9 , Phil Koczan  11 , Theodoros N Arvanitis  12 , Mary McCarthy  13 , Simon Jones  1 , Imran Rafi  6
Affiliations

Patients' online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review

Simon de Lusignan et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the effect of providing patients online access to their electronic health record (EHR) and linked transactional services on the provision, quality and safety of healthcare. The objectives are also to identify and understand: barriers and facilitators for providing online access to their records and services for primary care workers; and their association with organisational/IT system issues.

Setting: Primary care.

Participants: A total of 143 studies were included. 17 were experimental in design and subject to risk of bias assessment, which is reported in a separate paper. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria have also been published elsewhere in the protocol.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Our primary outcome measure was change in quality or safety as a result of implementation or utilisation of online records/transactional services.

Results: No studies reported changes in health outcomes; though eight detected medication errors and seven reported improved uptake of preventative care. Professional concerns over privacy were reported in 14 studies. 18 studies reported concern over potential increased workload; with some showing an increase workload in email or online messaging; telephone contact remaining unchanged, and face-to face contact staying the same or falling. Owing to heterogeneity in reporting overall workload change was hard to predict. 10 studies reported how online access offered convenience, primarily for more advantaged patients, who were largely highly satisfied with the process when clinician responses were prompt.

Conclusions: Patient online access and services offer increased convenience and satisfaction. However, professionals were concerned about impact on workload and risk to privacy. Studies correcting medication errors may improve patient safety. There may need to be a redesign of the business process to engage health professionals in online access and of the EHR to make it friendlier and provide equity of access to a wider group of patients. A1 SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42012003091.

Keywords: PRIMARY CARE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA Flowchart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Carman D, Britten N. Confidentiality of medical records the patients's perspective. Br J Gen Pract 1995;45:485–8 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mandl KD, Szolovits P, Kohane IS. Public standards and patients’ control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private. BMJ 2001;322:283–7 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wiljer D, Urowitz S, Apatu E, et al. Canadian committee for patient accessible health records. Patient accessible EHR: exploring recommendations for successful implementation strategies. J Med Internet Res 2008;10:e34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tiik M. Rules and access rights of the Estonian integrated e-Health system. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;156:245–56 - PubMed
    1. Pearce C, Bainbridge M. A personally controlled electronic health record for Australia. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21:707–13 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources