Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2015 Jul;20(4):394-6.
doi: 10.1111/anec.12208. Epub 2014 Sep 9.

Progressive interatrial block and supraventricular arrhythmias

Affiliations
Case Reports

Progressive interatrial block and supraventricular arrhythmias

Andres Enriquez et al. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Interatrial conduction disorders are frequent in patients with structural heart diseases, including hypertension, coronary disease, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and they are strongly associated with atrial tachyarrhythmias, especially atrial fibrillation and flutter. Conduction delays lead to dispersion of refractory periods and participate in initiating and maintaining reentry circuits, facilitating atrial arrhythmias. In this case, the changing pattern over time is a manifestation of progressive atrial remodeling and conduction delay. The terminal negative component of the P wave in the inferior leads suggests block of the electrical impulse in the Bachman bundle zone, with retrograde activation of the left atria via muscular connections at the coronary sinus. This has been reproduced in experimental models and confirmed by endocardial mapping. Physicians should be aware of the association between advanced interatrial block and development of atrial arrhythmias as its recognition could prompt early and aggressive antiarrhythmic treatment.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; atrial flutter; interatrial block.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Electrocardiographic progression of P‐wave width and morphology over a 6‐year period. 2007: P wave of 110 ms. 2011: P wave of 120 ms with a small negative deflection at the terminal portion. 2013: P wave of 135 ms with biphasic morphology (±) in II, III, and aVF.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Twelve‐lead ECG of left atrial tachycardia with 2:1 atrioventricular conduction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Activation map of the tachycardia in NavX depicting a counterclockwise perimitral macroreentry. Colors indicate activation time from red (early) to purple (late).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bayés de Luna A, Platonov P, Cosio FG, et al. Interatrial blocks. A separate entity from left atrial enlargement: a consensus report. J Electrocardiol 2012;45:445–451. - PubMed
    1. Ariyarajah V, Spodick DH. Progression of partial to advanced interatrial block. J Electrocardiol 2006;39(2):177–179 - PubMed
    1. Bayés de Luna A, Cladellas M, Oter R, et al. Interatrial conduction block and retrograde activation of the left atrium and paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. Eur Heart J 1988;9:1112–1118. - PubMed
    1. Conde D, Baranchuk A. Interatrial block as anatomical‐electrical substrate for supraventricular arrhythmias: Bayes’ syndrome. Arch Mex Cardiol 2014;84(1):32–40. - PubMed
    1. Caldwell J, Koppikar S, Barake W, et al. Prolonged P‐wave duration is associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence after successful pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2014;39(2):131–138. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms