Efficacy and time-to-hemostasis of antegrade femoral access closure using the ExoSeal vascular closure device: a retrospective single-center study
- PMID: 25201516
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.08.006
Efficacy and time-to-hemostasis of antegrade femoral access closure using the ExoSeal vascular closure device: a retrospective single-center study
Abstract
Objective: To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and time-to-hemostasis of antegrade femoral access closure using the ExoSeal vascular closure device (VCD).
Design: Retrospective, single-center analysis.
Materials and methods: Between September 2010 and February 2013, 148 ExoSeal VCD closures (5-7F) of antegrade femoral accesses were performed in 119 patients (70 males, mean age 71.6 years, range 40-97 years). In all cases initial diagnostic angiography was performed via an 18G/3.8F retrograde femoral access, which was left in place during intervention (in-house standard) and was used to obtain control angiography after successful closure of the antegrade access to determine hemostasis. Technical device success was defined as ExoSeal closure without major VCD-related complications; procedural success as hemostasis within 5 minutes. Statistical analysis was performed using a logistic regression model and correlation analyses.
Results: 145/148 (98.0%) ExoSeal closures were technically successful (5F: n = 76; 6F: n = 65; 7F: n = 7). Angiographic control showed closure after 2 minutes in 130/145 cases. In a further 14 cases hemostasis was achieved after an additional 3 minutes MC, so that closure was successful within 5 minutes in 144/148 cases (97.3%). No major complication occurred. One minor complication was recorded in a 6F access case. Pre-interventional activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was the only statistically significant predictor of necessary manual compression (MC) > 2 minutes (p = .01), but with an odds-ratio of only 1.038. The INR showed an odds-ratio of 2.455 for need for 5 minutes MC (NS). Significant correlations were found between the need for 5 minutes MC and medication with acetylsalicylic acid (p = .01), clopidogrel (p < .01), and abciximab (p < .001).
Conclusion: ExoSeal vascular closure of antegrade femoral punctures is safe and effective with a low complication rate. Two minutes of MC are sufficient to achieve hemostasis in the majority of cases. However, in patients on antiplatelet therapy, especially after abciximab, the authors advocate prolonging MC to 5 minutes.
Keywords: Antegrade femoral access; ExoSeal; VCD; Vascular closure device.
Copyright © 2014 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Retrospective evaluation of safety and effectiveness of the EXOSEAL vascular closure device for single vascular closure and closure after repeat puncture in diagnostic and interventional radiology: single-center experience.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 May;24(5):698-702. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.02.014. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23622041
-
The Use of ExoSeal Vascular Closure Device for Direct Antegrade Superficial Femoral Artery Puncture Site Hemostasis.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Jun;38(3):560-4. doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-0984-0. Epub 2014 Sep 11. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25209597
-
Factors related to insufficient hemostasis using the EXOSEAL vascular closure device with five-minutes compression for femoral artery punctures after neuro-endovascular therapy: A retrospective, single-center experience.Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Apr;30(2):255-263. doi: 10.1177/15910199221138367. Epub 2022 Nov 10. Interv Neuroradiol. 2024. PMID: 36357980 Free PMC article.
-
Complication rates associated with antegrade use of vascular closure devices: a systematic review and pooled analysis.J Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;73(2):722-730.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.133. Epub 2020 Sep 17. J Vasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32950629
-
Comparison of manual compression and vascular hemostasis devices after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):151-162. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Aug 19. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018. PMID: 28941744
Cited by
-
Intravascular ultrasound findings of the protrusion of the EXOSEAL plug that caused acute limb ischemia.J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2022 Dec 20;9(1):101083. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2022.101083. eCollection 2023 Mar. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2022. PMID: 36747600 Free PMC article.
-
Balloon-assisted ExoSeal closure for inadvertent subclavian artery cannulation following central venous catheterization: A case report.Sci Prog. 2025 Jul-Sep;108(3):368504251363121. doi: 10.1177/00368504251363121. Epub 2025 Jul 30. Sci Prog. 2025. PMID: 40739893 Free PMC article.
-
Antegrade common femoral artery closure device use is associated with decreased complications.J Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;72(5):1610-1617.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.01.052. Epub 2020 Mar 9. J Vasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 32165058 Free PMC article.
-
Access site pseudoaneurysms after endovascular intervention for peripheral arterial diseases.Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019 Jun;96(6):305-312. doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.96.6.305. Epub 2019 May 29. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019. PMID: 31183335 Free PMC article.
-
ULSOSEAL Technique: A Unique Technique to Achieve Hemostasis Using ExoSeal in High-Risk Patients after Common Femoral Artery Puncture.J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Aug 28;2021:2470333. doi: 10.1155/2021/2470333. eCollection 2021. J Interv Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 34526872 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous