Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2014 Sep 8:14:107.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-107.

Evaluation of a group based cognitive behavioural therapy programme for menstrual pain management in young women with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a mixed methods controlled clinical trial

Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Evaluation of a group based cognitive behavioural therapy programme for menstrual pain management in young women with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a mixed methods controlled clinical trial

Susan Kennedy et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: Menstrual pain which is severe enough to impact on daily activities is very common amongst menstruating females. Research suggests that menstrual pain which impacts on daily functioning may be even more prevalent amongst those with intellectual disabilities. Despite this, little research attention has focused on pain management programmes for those with intellectual disabilities.The aims of this pilot study were to develop and evaluate a theory-based cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) programme for menstrual pain management in young women with intellectual disabilities.

Methods/design: The study utilised a mixed methods controlled clinical trial to evaluate elements from a CBT programme called Feeling Better (McGuire & McManus, 2010). The Feeling Better programme is a modular, manualised intervention designed for people with an intellectual disability and their carers. The programme was delivered to 36 young women aged 12-30 years who have a Mild-Moderate Intellectual Disability, split between two conditions. The treatment group received the Feeling Better intervention and the control group received treatment as usual. To evaluate the effectiveness of the programme, measures were taken of key pain variables including impact, knowledge, self-efficacy and coping. Process evaluation was conducted to examine which elements of the programme were most successful in promoting change.

Discussion: Participants in the intervention group were expected to report the use of a greater number of coping strategies and have greater knowledge of pain management strategies following participation in the intervention and at three month follow-up, when compared to control group participants. A significant advantage of the study was the use of mixed methods and inclusion of process evaluation to determine which elements of a cognitive behavioural therapy programme work best for individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN75567759.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Association for the Study of Pain. International Association for the Study of Pain: classification of chronic pain. Pain. 1986;24:1–226. - PubMed
    1. Walsh M, Morrison T, McGuire BE. Chronic pain in adults with an intellectual disability: prevalence, impact and health service use based on caregiver report. Pain. 2011;152:1951–1957. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGuire BE, Daly P, Smyth F. Chronic pain among people with an intellectual disability: Under-recognised and under-treated? J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010;54:240–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01254.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGuire BE, Kennedy S. Pain in people with an intellectual disability. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2013;26:270–275. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32835fd74c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davis AR, Westhoff CL. Primary dysmenorrhea in adolescent girls and treatment with oral contraceptives. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2001;14:3–8. doi: 10.1016/S1083-3188(00)00076-0. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data