Reproducibility of peak power output during a 10-s cycling maximal effort using different sampling rates
- PMID: 25201712
- DOI: 10.1556/APhysiol.101.2014.009
Reproducibility of peak power output during a 10-s cycling maximal effort using different sampling rates
Abstract
The study was aimed to investigate the reproducibility of performance parameters obtained from 10-s maximal cycling effort against different braking forces in young adult athletes. The sample (n = 48) included male athletes aged 18.9-29.9 years (175.5 ± 6.9 cm, 76.2 ± 10.1 kg). The exercise protocol was performed in a cycle-ergometer against a random braking force (4% to 11% of body mass). Intra-individual variation was examined from repeated tests within one week. Descriptive statistics were computed and differences between sessions were tested using paired t-test. The coefficient of correlation between repeated measures, technical error of measurement (TEM), coefficient of variation and ICC were calculated. Agreement between trials was examined using the Bland-Altman procedure. Mean values of peak power were relatively stable when obtained from sampling rates of 50 Hz and ranged between 1068 watt and 1082 watt (t(47) = 1.149, p = 0.256, ES-r = 0.165) or while corresponding to a sampling rate of 1 Hz (t(47) = 0.742, p = 0.462, ES-r = 0.107). Correlations between repeated measures were high (+0.907, 95% CI: +0.839 to +0.947) and TEM about 59.3 watt (%CV = 5.52%; ICC = 0.951, 95% CI: 0.912 to 0.972). The present study suggests that reproducibility of peak power in male adult athletes tended to be acceptable and within individual error appeared unrelated to braking force.
Keywords: Bland-Altman plot; anaerobic power; cycle-ergometer; intra-class correlation; short-term maximal intensity effort; technical error of measurement reliability.
Similar articles
-
Reliability of a 2-bout exercise test on a wattbike cycle ergometer.Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014 Mar;9(2):340-5. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0103. Epub 2013 Aug 6. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014. PMID: 23920473
-
Reliability of physiological attributes and their association with stochastic cycling performance.Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014 Mar;9(2):309-15. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0048. Epub 2013 Jul 22. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014. PMID: 23881270
-
Reliability of a 5 x 6-s maximal cycling repeated-sprint test in trained female team-sport athletes.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Nov;98(4):383-93. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0284-8. Epub 2006 Sep 6. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006. PMID: 16955291 Clinical Trial.
-
Reliability of a novel testing protocol to assess upper-body strength qualities in elite athletes.Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014 Sep;9(5):871-5. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0332. Epub 2014 Feb 7. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014. PMID: 24509817
-
Measurement error in short-term power testing in young people.J Sports Sci. 2003 Feb;21(2):135-42. doi: 10.1080/0264041031000070868. J Sports Sci. 2003. PMID: 12630792 Review.
Cited by
-
Caveats and Recommendations to Assess the Validity and Reliability of Cycling Power Meters: A Systematic Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 5;22(1):386. doi: 10.3390/s22010386. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35009945 Free PMC article.
-
Reproducibility of estimated optimal peak output using a force-velocity test on a cycle ergometer.PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0193234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193234. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29474490 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous