Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;8(3):381-388.
doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.137652.

Comparison of anti-plaque efficacy between a low and high cost dentifrice: A short term randomized double-blind trial

Affiliations

Comparison of anti-plaque efficacy between a low and high cost dentifrice: A short term randomized double-blind trial

Rahul Ganavadiya et al. Eur J Dent. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the anti-plaque efficacy of a low and high cost commercially available tooth paste among 13-20 years old adolescents in a Residential Home, Bhopal, India.

Materials and methods: The study was randomized double-blind parallel clinical trial conducted in a Residential Home, Bhopal, India. A total of 65 patients with established dental plaque and gingivitis were randomly assigned to either low cost or high cost dentifrice group for 4 weeks. The plaque and gingival scores at baseline and post-intervention were assessed and compared. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and the independent sample t-test. The statistical significance was fixed at 0.05.

Results: Results indicated a significant reduction in plaque and gingival scores in both groups post-intervention compared with the baseline. Difference between the groups was not significant. No adverse events were reported and both the dentifrices were well-tolerated.

Conclusion: Low cost dentifrice is equally effective to the high cost dentifrice in reducing plaque and gingival inflammation.

Keywords: Cost; dentifrices; gingivitis; plaque; toothpastes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Prasad KV, Sohani R, Tikare S, Yelamalli M, Rajesh G, Javali SB. Anti-plaque efficacy of two commercially available dentifrices. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent. 2009;1:12–7. - PubMed
    1. Singh S, Chaknis P, DeVizio W, Petrone M, Panagakos FS, Proskin HM. A clinical investigation of the efficacy of three commercially available dentifrices for controlling established gingivitis and supragingival plaque. J Clin Dent. 2010;21:105–10. - PubMed
    1. Jin LJ, Armitage GC, Klinge B, Lang NP, Tonetti M, Williams RC. Global oral health inequalities: Task group - Periodontal disease. Adv Dent Res. 2011;23:221–6. - PubMed
    1. Shaju JP, Zade RM, Das M. Prevalence of periodontitis in the Indian population: A literature review. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2011;15:29–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin S, Mauk A. Raghavan R, Johar Z, editors. Oral Health: Addressing Dental Diseases in Rural India. Implementing public health interventions in developing countries. ICTPH, Thanjavur, India. IKP Centre for Technologies in Public Health. 2011;(Ch 4):105–29.